![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
A few more comments, up to TI-07.5. Sorry I'm moving along with this so slowly.
NA-TI-05: I'm not certain about this. Here is a case where it would really be helpful to have the actual Narn texts instead of just CRT's version. It's possible, after all, that the reason the statement is not in the "final" text is that Tolkien decided against it. I am somewhat inclined to exclude the note to be safe. NA-TI-06: I have less of a reservation about using this note; but I think the placement of it may be awkward. NA-EX-27: I agree that this is not a perfect place for this material; but you are right that it must be included somewhere. This place seems as good as any to me. NA-TI-07: I would rather not include this note. Again, I wish we knew more about this "variant text". But in this case it offers a distinctly different story from the given text. When and to whom Turin reveals his true identity is not a trivial point. I would take the safer course and follow the more authoritative "final text", in the absence of other evidence. NA-TI-07.5: A similar problem. If we knew that the final text given by CRT was in fact Tolkien's final intention, then clearly we would omit the note, leaving the geography what it is in that text, whether it makes sense or not. But of course we don't know that. I suppose I can agree with adding the explication from the note. However, as the emendation stands it is ungrammatical and seems to alter the intended movements: Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Aiwendil; 05-29-2005 at 05:59 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Posted by Aiwendil:
Quote:
NA-EX-27: So we agree on this. NA-TI-05: In this particular case you might be right. Christopher Tolkien said in his forword: Quote:
NA-TI-06: What about this palcement: Quote:
NA-TI-07.5: Reading it again I must say that we should even make the first part past perfect since it is already in retrospect. What does not sweet me in your version is the loss of "remained in the Vale of Sirion". Thus I would suggest: Quote:
Findegil |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
In answer to post #5 were Aiwendil remarked that he missed some markings of my editing, I have reworked the section in question. I give here therfore the complet battle in full text (I think the text is short enough for such a treatment). Mark that all editings NA-TI-04 to NA-TI-04.8 are based on GA, appended Note 2.
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||||
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
I am really very sorry for my long absence. I hope that I can get around to looking over more of the changes sometime this weekend.
NA-EX-19: I think we might actually stay closer to the original with: Quote:
NA-EX-21, -22: I'm still unsure about this. The trouble as I see it is that the Narn version is told exclusively from the point of view of the western host. Reading what we are given of the Narn version I do not feel at all sure that Uldor's plot was removed entirely. We have only the indirect evidence that Fingon sees dust rising in the east. There is also something of a minor mystery in the Narn text - though Maedhros sets forth at the right time, he does not fire the beacon. I suppose one could blame this on the second host sent from Angband to attack him - but wasn't the whole point of Maedhros's assault to draw out the forces of Angband, at which time the beacon would be fired? So I still see think it quite possible that Uldor's machinations were retained and simply omitted from the Narn version, which focuses only on the western battle. I suppose, though, that this may not be enough to justify any actual, explicit reference to Uldor's plot. I need to think about this a little bit more. Findegil wrote: Quote:
Quote:
It is only for this reason that I wish we had more tangible proof that the troll-guard are in the Narn text. Ultimately, though, I agree that it is probably best to include them, despite the problems this creates. NA-TI-01b: This version looks good to me. One very minor point - I would delete a comma: Quote:
NA-TI-06: I suppose this placement works. NA-TI-07: Findegil wrote: Quote:
NA-TI-07.5: I guess I'm a little worried here about whether there is a conflict between the "final" version where "it seems necessary to suppose . . . that they remained in the Vale of Sirion" and the "tentative version" wherein "they went away southwards . . . but the men becoming discontented in that "harbourless land", Turin was persuaded to lead them back." It seems to me that the implication in that tentative version is that they did not remain in the Vale of Sirion, but departed southward and later returned to the Vale of Sirion. I would, then, either say simply that they remained in the Vale of Sirion (and exclude the bit where they go south) or say that they went southward (and exlude the claim that they "remained in the Vale of Sirion"). |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I don't mind how slow the project goes on, as long as it still has a chance to go on at all!
NA-EX-19: Aiwendil worte: Quote:
NA-EX-21, -22: The not fired bacon is really a riddle, but the course of the battle is clearly changed in the Narn version. From what we get in the Narn it seems clear to me that Maedhros was not late with his attack. There were no wishpers of treason in the western army. Thus if Uldor's machinations were still present they were not effective in the way they had been in Sil77. On the basis of this I can't see how we could work them in, without creating an entirely new thread in the story. A reason why the beacon never was fired could be that Maedhros was cut of from Dorthonion by the Easterlings of Uldor before he could sent the order to fire it. And afterwards he would not fire it in the hope that Fingon would be save from the disaster of that day when he stayed in Hithlum, not knowing that Fingon was already involved in fights of his own. On the other hand it would not be any great wonder if a bacon fired when Fingon was already fare out on Anfauglith would not be marked by many and not found any mention in the battle description. Aiwendil wrote: Quote:
In the fight of Gothmog and Fingon there is no mention of the troll-guard, thus they were possibly not there. They might have been in the fighting the night before when Fingon was surrounded and hid themselves during the day in some dark place near at hand (Taur-nu-Fuin?), approaching the fight again when the sun went down behind Ered Wethrin. In the The Hobbit the trolls changed into stone exactly when the sun peeped over the rim of the mountains, thus the trolls could stand the dawn, and I suppose the dusk as well. Aiwendil wrote: Quote:
NA-TI-01b, NA-EX-12 & NA-TI-06: So these points are done. NA-TI-07: So what is about using the words of Algund in the place were Túrin takes up the helm. Thus we would get some more material for the rather week Dor-Cúrathol part: Quote:
Could it be that you, Aiwendil, placed the Woodman nearer to the crossing of Taeglin, as I did at first myself? Then a southward movement would clearly lead out of the vale of Sirion. But the map does provide us with a place for the Woodman and the Outlaws that fits all statments in the text, I created, with the sole exception of Túrin twice crossing the road south of the crossing of Taeglin in a journey of only three days. But for that problem it is possible to disagree with Christopher Tolkiens statment "that that they were not far from their previous haunts at the time of the Orc-raid on the homes of the Woodmen". It seems probable that they were much father to the west at that time. Respectfully Findegil |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||||
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
A few more comments for the moment.
NA-TI-08.5: We might as well make this a footnote. NA-EX-27.5: Again, we have "alternate" forms without any indication what their chronological relations are. I can at the moment think of no later source wherein we'd find the name, so I suppose we have no reason to think any form superior to the others. I suppose in that case, it's best to go with "Nibin-noeg". NA-EX-27.7: This also looks okay to me as a footnote. NA-TI-09: I'm not sure that the alternative form of the curse must be used - it's possible that Androg's curse simply didn't come true. It's Dwarves' curses that one is supposed to have to fear, not Mens'! Again, I wish we knew more about the various texts of the Narn and why Christopher used the version he did and called the other an "alternative". I suppose that since we don't have any information that suggests either version to be of higher priority, we may as well use the alternative. NA-TI-11: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On to the previous discussion: NA-EX-19: Ah, I missed that alteration in the sequence of assaults. NA-EX-21, -22: I suppose you're right. NA-TI-07: Good idea; using it there seems to work. NA-TI-07.5: I think you are right. I had been thinking of the "Vale of Sirion" as a smaller region - as, more or less, the area near the confluence of Taeglin and Sirion. But I suppose it makes more sense to think of it as a long valley cut by Sirion all the way down to Andram. Still, I think that the phrasing of the passage as it now stands suggests a contradiction (even though there isn't one); I would rather make it: Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
NA-TI-08.5, NA-EX-27.7: Both were planed as footnotes. Maybe my editing was not entierly clear in this.
NA-TI-11: Your suggestions is a good deal better then mine. NA-TI-28.5: I dessired to clear the riddle, and this was the only way I could think of doing so. If we retain it at all I would suggest to bring in a bit earlier: Quote:
NA-TI-07.5: I did split use of the note for the reason that it would take some time before the outlaws came the land above Aelin-uial and became discontent their. In addition I find it much better to make Beleg follow them before we tell that they came at least back to the place were Beleg first found their track. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|