![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#40 | ||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
![]()
Interesting. Thanks for your comments.
![]() It was inevitable that, to adapt the book to film, there would be changes, including changes in the characters, plotline etc. But I can understand that, when people who know and love the books see such changes as unnecessary, it can put them off. Personally, I think that most (although not all) of the changes can be justified on a film adaptation rationale. In particular, as far as character changes are concerned, they felt that they had to make changes in order to tie in with the themes that they wanted to emphasise and/or enhance the appeal of the characters for modern (non-book reading) film audiences. On the latter point, I have some sympathy for the view that perhaps they were under-estimating audiences and should have taken a punt with the characters as Tolkien wrote them. Although I can also understand why they didn't want to take a risk on such a big budget film. It does seem to me that, to really enjoy the films (or at least not to feel anger, frustration etc at them), one has to either accept that they tell a slightly different story with slightly (or, in some cases quite markedly) different characters, like I do, or look for the book characters in the film characters, like Essex does. Even then, of course, there are minor points of irritation - for me these occur where the films are internally inconsistent or where a scene seems to me to be gratuitous. But then, few films, if any, can match the expectations of their audiences perfectly. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |