![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#14 | |||||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
RD-EX-51
Findegil wrote: Quote:
RD-SL-20 We ought to try to be clear about this. Why did we delete the element of the treachery? I can think of two possible reasons: 1. In the later legendarium, Elvish treachery would not be sufficient to bypass the Girdle. 2. In the later legendarium, Elvish treachery is impossibly unlikely. I had thought that our justification for the change was 2. If this is the case, then nothing has altered the fact that Elvish treachery would overcome the Girdle, and so the hypothetical statement would be fine. But perhaps it is not so clear that reason 2 was our justification. If 1 is also a concern, then I agree that the line should be dropped. §37a I must say again that I don't see the "somehow" as doing any good for us. Your expanded proposal ("No tale tells . . .") is better in that regard. But I wonder whether it's going too far - besides the fact that it alters the text, it invents the fact that no tale tells more of the luring of Thingol outside the Girdle. But surely the full tale of the Necklace of the Woe of Thingol does give a full account. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If I understand what you intend, would perhaps this work: Quote:
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |