![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#40 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I am far from being one of the lore-masters who have brilliantly argued the Kingship of the Noldor, but I have read all the materials they reference. As I read it, the actual argument became lost to me.
The thing that stands out the most is that there was not a unified Noldor after the fall of Finwe; hence, you can not have a recognized King. As has been cited and re-cited ad nauseam, when Finwe died there were three contenders for the Kingship as is evidenced by the fact that each of the Sons of Finwe had their own following, with Fingolfin's being far greater than the other two. When Finarfin forsook the March, he became High King of the Noldor on Tuna after his pardon by the Valar. Quote:
Hence, Feanor and his sons were never deemed to be Kings of the Noldor at all, simply because they (by their actions and those of the majority of their peoples) had no enforceable right to the title. At least that's the way I see it... (and I'm sure the scholarly posters will soon destroy my post!) [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img] [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img] [ September 13, 2002: Message edited by: Grond - Hammer of Hell ] |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |