The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > Novices and Newcomers
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-16-2004, 08:17 PM   #16
Legolas G.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re:

Sam did go on with out Frodo. When Frodo was stung by Shelob, Sam took the Ring and was going to continue on because he thought that Frodo was dead. But then he found out that Frodo was still alive.
But other then Sam, I think Aragorn could have been the Ringbearer. He seems strong. I don't think the Ring would have taken hold of him easily. Maybe not at all.
On second thought, Aragorn is the heir of Isildor. And Isildor couldn't destroy the Ring because it took him easily. So Aragorn has that weakness. And the Nazgul were men. They were also easily taken by the Ring. So the hearts of men are easily corupted.
Now I'm not sure.
But what about Elves? Elves aren't easily taken by the Ring. So maybe Legolas could have been the Ringbearer.
Yes, an Elf could definitely be the Ringbearer.
Are there anymore that might have been a good Ringbearer?
Dwarves would probably be easily taken like men. All they care about is riches, and they might try to keep the Ring and use it.
I'll keep thinking about this. For now I think an Elf would have been the best Ringbearer.
[QUOTE]

Last edited by Legolas G.; 02-17-2004 at 05:39 PM.
  Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.