Lord of the Rings: Both sides of the argument - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Eurytus · 12-09-2003, 10:03 AM

I believe I made it quite clear. Peter Jackson deserves the best director accolade if he does the best directing job of 2003. Effort and enthusiasm does not come into it. Best director and best film are closely linked which is why the same production often wins both. That is why 10 out of the last 13 years the same production has won both.<P>And you have not made it clear how you have decided that PJ deserves the best director Oscar based on a 2-minute trailer.

12-09-2003, 10:03 AM	#26
Eurytus Wight Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: England Posts: 179	I believe I made it quite clear. Peter Jackson deserves the best director accolade if he does the best directing job of 2003. Effort and enthusiasm does not come into it. Best director and best film are closely linked which is why the same production often wins both. That is why 10 out of the last 13 years the same production has won both.<P>And you have not made it clear how you have decided that PJ deserves the best director Oscar based on a 2-minute trailer. __________________ "This is the most blatant case of false advertising since my suit against the movie The Neverending Story!" Lionel Hutz