* * Revised Fall of Gondolin pt 1 [General Revisions & 'Of Tuor' Revisions]* * - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

**lindil** · 10-04-2002, 04:13 AM

Ok begining my humble attempts to grapple w/ this.

first off, there are a number of links to various revisions, I am using the latest one in the sept 22 thread entitled Antoine and Co.'s Fall of Gondolin [ w/ UT Tuor] of the Translations from the Elvish forum. it took me a good bit of time to sort out the many texts in the private forum so just in case anyone lse felt confused about where to start or what version was being commented on.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FG -16 - is everyone agreed on Ork/s [replacing the published Orc/s]?

While I agree on most princciples [not the aesthetic ones] we will be departing from the LotR.

FG 23 So JRRT changed -iath to iad in a
late[r] note, What exactly are the implications for *Doriath* then?

FG - 31 remove

Fg 34 is a def improvement [ to me at least] are we ruling out a Q or S replacemnet form of 'greeleaf' ?

I hope to tackle the RS TCG - o2 section tomorrow, if not I will aim for sunday.

Maedhros - is it possible for you to insert the section markers [ FG-M-04 for instance] in your version? that would make it far more usable for editing.

10-04-2002, 04:13 AM	#4
lindil Seeker of the Straight Path Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: a hidden fastness in Big Valley nor cal Posts: 1,680	Ok begining my humble attempts to grapple w/ this. first off, there are a number of links to various revisions, I am using the latest one in the sept 22 thread entitled Antoine and Co.'s Fall of Gondolin [ w/ UT Tuor] of the Translations from the Elvish forum. it took me a good bit of time to sort out the many texts in the private forum so just in case anyone lse felt confused about where to start or what version was being commented on. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ FG -16 - is everyone agreed on Ork/s [replacing the published Orc/s]? While I agree on most princciples [not the aesthetic ones] we will be departing from the LotR. FG 23 So JRRT changed -iath to iad in a late[r] note, What exactly are the implications for Doriath then? FG - 31 remove Fg 34 is a def improvement [ to me at least] are we ruling out a Q or S replacemnet form of 'greeleaf' ? I hope to tackle the RS TCG - o2 section tomorrow, if not I will aim for sunday. Maedhros - is it possible for you to insert the section markers [ FG-M-04 for instance] in your version? that would make it far more usable for editing. __________________ The dwindling Men of the West would often sit up late into the night exchanging lore & wisdom such as they still possessed that they should not fall back into the mean estate of those who never knew or indeed rebelled against the Light.