![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#37 | ||
Dead Serious
|
I have been, very slowly, rereading The Lord of the Rings this summer (so much less free time than when I was half-employed...) and, having both pushed on into "Treebeard" and having found myself pining for meaty Barrow-discussion, I thought I'd dig up this old thread. Nor have I been disappointed.
There are nuggets aplenty in here, and a few that have me wondering/thinking. Quote:
The reason this comment struck me with particular reference to the chapter at hand, however, is this: the whole thread revolves around orks. They are the centrepiece of the chapter and thus of the discussion, and even taking into account "The Choices of Master Samwise" and "The Tower of Cirith Ungol," this is the most substantial account of them we have, encompassing the entire chapter and three different branches of their kind (Northern, Isengarder, and Mordorian--Grishnįkh has always seemed clearly distinct from the Northerners to me, a point that I think the movies have somewhat obscured.) Anyway, this chapter is all about the orks, and the picture is vivid: orks are not pleasant. Yet, in connection with the comment of Master Felagund quoted above, I have to wonder if the Isengarders at least might not be clean. The white page, says Saruman, can be overwritten, and I say that the white car gets muddy easily, and I can't imagine the White Hand being much better. Yet the Uruk-hai, with their martial pride, seem likely to want to keep their emblems clear. Does this mean they're likely a rather clean people? On a related note, perhaps it's only those who hold that "cleanliness is next to godliness" that would have a problem with this connection in the first place. Quote:
(Mind you, there are other issues that bear on it, such as the fact that dragons could far more plausibly be bodies incarnated by evil Maiarin spirits, or the fact that Orks are meant to be a deliberate perversion of the Eruhini and thus fraught with extra complications dragons are free from, but I think the basic idea here still has merit to consider.) Turning to the chapter itself, rather than this distilled brandy of a discussion, it struck me in reading just how creepy Grishnįkh is. More so than any other ork, and possibly more so than any other villain in The Lord of the Rings, Grishnįkh seems wicked. By contrast, Uglśk seems almost honest--Grishnįkh's contempt for him makes the Uruk-hai seem almost like noble warriors. ...but then I catch myself remembering, at the end of the chapter, how Merry and Pippin feel about the prospect of the Uruk-hai winning the battle against the Riders. To them, it is clear, Uglśk and his ilk are every bit as bad as Grishnįkh; it is only me, as the reader, that sees Uglśk as markedly better. A reminder, perhaps, that the lesser of two evils still looks pretty evil.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |