![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
![]()
Correct P, there is no CC.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Home (either of them)
Posts: 151
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
But I will run until my feet no longer run no more |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Beloved Shadow
|
![]() Quote:
Okay, so, here's what I'm thinking. Inzil has a point about consistency. If someone isn't doing much then suddenly says enough in which one could find an Elendil dream hint, that sticks out. Everyone ought to do something consistently- at the very least post enough in which to bury a hint. And so my 3-name thing seems like the bare minimum, right? I mean honestly- if asking everyone to randomly list 3 people in their first post each day is too much, we may as well modfire everyone. Show up in the morning and say "Inzil-Shasta-Nerwen" and bang, you're done. Totally not difficult. Now, for those that post more than others (e.g. me) I suppose it isn't technically necessary as I'm saying enough every day that slipping in a dream hint wouldn't be a problem, but I think the low-volume posters ought to be forced to agree to this plan. I mean- if they can't be bothered to type three people's names every 48 hours then we may as well lynch them. Also- did anyone give any thoughts on my idea for Isildur to just save whoever gets lynched today given the simple odds at this point in the village? Finally- are we ready for Amandil to step up?
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Home (either of them)
Posts: 151
![]() |
I agree that it is a good idea to go through every possible situation, Inzil, that's why I keep pointing out why it does work. So that every argument, pro and against, gets said. There is a reason why I haven't posted a list yet, that's because I don't want everyone to just jump blindly in, but I cannot come up with any proper problems; that doesn't mean that you or someone else couldn't.
__________________
But I will run until my feet no longer run no more |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Beloved Shadow
|
![]()
I'm still turning the implications of the roles over in my mind here- hope no one minds all this thinking out loud and asking for input. (To our moddess- seriously I find these rules/roles to be quite fun for providing Day 1 musings. Well done.
![]() Lately I've been contemplating how bold dream recipients could potentially be even in the absence of Amandil. I mean- if last night's recipient admits to it and states the target, what are the baddies going to do about it? Kill him? I don't think so, as that would then prove the dream-target's innocence/guilt and simultaneously leave Elendil alive for another dream. I'm thinking the KM's would most definitely not attack the dream recipient and target because those are two people guaranteed not to be Elendil. Under this set up it would be ideal for Elendil to dream of the other gifteds or use them as recipients, as he simply has to be top priority for the Baddies thus they would as a rule shy away from killing his dreams. BUT how would the KMs even find Elendil given that he has zero secret verifiable information to pass on, as he himself is not the recipient? Seriously- I'm almost sorry for them. And on my earlier point about Isildur just using his power on Day 1, if he does so might he just go ahead and Day 1 reveal? It would give another trustable figure, and also rule out the necessity of bothering to dream of him. The only downside I think would be the KMs could rule him out as Elendil. Any thoughts on this?
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Beloved Shadow
|
![]()
Have not heard from these at all:
Lottie Sally Steve Brin
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Home (either of them)
Posts: 151
![]() |
Phantom: That is pretty much what I was heading to with "stating explicitly known innocents would indeed, as mentioned, put the KM in the situation where they either have to accept the amount of unknown roles getting smaller and smaller, as well as facing the threat of being found themselves, while hunting for Elendil; or keep killing the known innocents and know that nothing threats Elendil apart from lynch." Either we'd get a new innocent every day (one that pretty much isn't under the threat of dying, as long as Elendil stays alive, given that KM would hunt for Elendil), or a new KM would be revealed. This would need the chain for it to work, though - otherwise there's no trusting the dreams. Or would it be worth it for the KM to fake dream reveals? If they are sent a dream, then yes - they can lie and no-one can prove it wrong.
I'll need to think about Isildur before having an opinion on it.
__________________
But I will run until my feet no longer run no more |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Beloved Shadow
|
![]()
Yeah, Pom- the chain thing would force the choice. I suppose Elendil will logically send Amandil a dream tonight of his previous recipient to start things off, then it'll be up to him whether or not to continue from the opposite end of the chain the next night- assuming that the opposite end has not already been found guilty, that is. Given that circumstance I suppose Amandil's dream target (last night's recipient) would request night protection and be granted a second dream to restart the innocent chain.
In rereading the rules on the Admin page I noticed this under Elendil- Quote:
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |