![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CT/NY
Posts: 681
![]() |
Dear Village,
I second Nienna. Kthx. Love, me
__________________
Rise and rise again until lambs become lions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
I thought I was the only one not around and thought I should post first to say I'm around again but it seems it has been a real quiet Day indeed...
![]() I'll go into reading.
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
![]() |
Ok, I'm here and catching up.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Skyrim, again.
Posts: 820
![]() |
I'm here too, by coincidence.
__________________
Werewolves vs. Fishmen. The battle of the century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
![]() |
To start: no, Fea. If Hakon had dreamed of you and found you innocent, he would not have listed you as a possible bad guy. He would have left you out of a bad guy list. He would have tried to hint at your innocence. And the same reasoning that says he would dream you also applies to Boromir. The fact the your insisting on this makes you look far worse to me.
To continue: Having seriously considered the death of Lari, I have an idea. You see, we are hunting wolves, so when we see a villager over-react to suspicion, we think wolf. The wolves, however, are hunting something else all together, and there is another reason a villager may over-react to suspicion. I believe the wolves thought Lari was the ranger. Which means they chose killing her rather than let her live and gamble on lynching her. To finish: where is everyone? We can't afford to lose to quietness. Those people who haven't shown up yet really need to participate. I'll be around for maybe another hour and a half, and then I have to go.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
x/d with Nog
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The Werewolf's Companion
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 3,021
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm here. Getting caught up. Shouldn't take long - we're still on the same page.
__________________
I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night. Double Fenris
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
![]() |
Fea, what logic possibly draws you to the conclusion the Hakon did not dream Boro? He told us to not worry about the bear, then he listed possible bear suspects, one of whom was the actual bear. You're grasping and it's not fooling anyone.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Werewolf's Companion
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 3,021
![]() ![]() ![]() |
About the Nerwen confusion: I honestly have no idea. I didn't realize I'd added her in that first list. I was still sorting my thoughts out. That first list really wasn't very good - I forgot McCaber and included Nerwen. Major oops. Sorry.
EDIT: xed with Roa.
__________________
I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night. Double Fenris
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
And what's the point of speculating Hakon's possible dreams anyway as there is nothing conclusive - or even things that could be read as hints in any half-reliable way?
Even if you say that Hakon's posts are not conclusive Fea, I don't understand why are you continuosly referring to them as possibly showing you're innocent? Or at least that we should take them as pointing towards your innocence? Or to just only underline the possibility that they might point to your innocence if read on the "right angle"? Isn't that a bit deliberate? And still, looking at what happened actually suggests a different interpretation.
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
The end of Day2 was odd indeed...
As I read through those final hours last night I was quite convinced they were both wolves: Lari panicking against the suspicions but also offering this odd theory about Hakon's dreams to make Fea innocent and then Fea running to the stage in the end... But Lari was innocent. What Nerwen said about the POV of the wolves actually makes the situation even more confusing. The kill seems to point to Fea and the question remains whether that is bold bluffing (Fea is a wolf) or a set-up by the wolves (Fea is innocent). I would say it'd be a set-up by the wolves, but Fea's insistence on speculating about Hakon's dreams yet toDay makes me kind of worried. Like Inzil said: any attempt to use Hakon's possible dreams to point to one's innocence is a major reach... I mean I was already baffled on the postings of yesterDay as to why people mulled over whether Hakon had revealed someone's innocence as it quite clearly was not the case? Let me quote the famous first post once again - but look at the bolding this time. Quote:
It looks like a very solid tactics from the seer with no major concern on his life on Day1; hinting we should look at other problems, casting the name out in the open but not in a too obvious fashion (like mentioning only Boro). But how does one turn that and the other "infamous statement": Quote:
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
McCaber: As you seem to be around, why don't you share your thoughts on people as I don't quite remember you saying too much in this game thus far?
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Nog, I never said that Hakon conclusively said anything about anybody's innocence. Because he didn't conclusively say anything at all except that he was using forbidden logic.
That being said, he definitely dreamed of somebody, and since I don't think he dreamed of Boro, that leaves me to wonder who he did dream of. If he didn't dream of Boro, then the logical conclusion is that he dreamed of one of the other people he mentioned. Hence, maybe he dreamed of me, maybe he didn't. This really has been a dead day... I was gone for hours and was expecting a slew of posts upon my return. Apparently I expected wrong. Let me think for a bit and I'll get back to everyone.
__________________
peace
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |