![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
NA-RG-57: I simply meant that I agree to the change you suggested.
NA-SL-04: I think that is too specific. Posted by Aran e-Godhellim Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Halls of Mandos
Posts: 86
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
NA-SL-04 is proving quite tricky. I thought of:
Quote:
Another possibility is: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Halls of Mandos
Posts: 86
![]() |
Hey! How about:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
The only problem is that, if I recall correctly, Tolkien's alliteration treats 'sc'/'sk' as distinct from 's' or soft 'c' by itself.
How about: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
For me the best found so far is:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Halls of Mandos
Posts: 86
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|