![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 82
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
"But a new day is come. Here I will stay at peace, and renounce name and kin; and so I will put my shadow behind me, or at the least not lay it upon those that I love." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dead Serious
|
Sweet!
I have my own place on LMP's Great List. Albeit a lowish one... However, to the subject at hand... Morsul, I really hate to put it so bluntly, but using other Downers as an authority is absurd folly. If that were permissible, you could use yourself as an authority, and we would all have to agree with you- even though we don't- because you are a Barrow-Downer. The only person who's words we can take as authoritative are those belonging to J.R.R. Tolkien. And, as far as I can see, there has been a lot of evidence presented on this thread that Tolkien used Goblin and Ork interchangeably (albeit the first dominated The Hobbit while the second dominated all other works). I have yet to see a smidgeon of evidence that Uruk-hai (meaning literally Ork-people) were in any was a crossbreeding of "Orks and goblins". Mind you, since Orks and Goblins are one and the same, and Uruk refers, in colloquial ork-speech, to larger orks, it is entirely possible- though foolish to the point of tomfoolery, to say that Uruks are bred from Orks and Goblins. One could also say that Goblins are bred from Orks and Uruks, or that Orks are bred from Uruks and Goblins. The three terms are interchangeable- save that Uruk, as applied in everyday Orkish, is used solely for the larger, more dominant members of the race. Snaga is the applicable term for the smaller ones.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Illusionary Holbytla
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,547
![]() |
The main point for goblins being different than Orcs seems to be size. However, I think this is being looked at rather wrongly. The mountain-dwelling orcs/goblins are almost certainly smaller. This is alluded to in several places - the Hobbit, the "mountain maggots" in the Uruk-Hai chapter of TTT, etc. This is not an absolute rule - Azog, for example, was quite a large Orc. However, the mountain orcs are generally smaller. This is not, however, because they are goblins, nor are they called goblins simply because they are smaller. They are just a smaller variety of orcs. Orcs are also goblins. It is just an unfortunate point that the smaller sort are the kind in the Hobbit and the Hobbit almost always uses the word goblin. These are two separate issues that seem to have merged incorrectly into one.
From Morsul's first Downer quote: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
no im not saying thats this person is an authoritative source. what im saying is with this idea floating around so long one could see why my ideas got crosslinked and i mistook movie for book at that point Quote:
I have to admit i was nontoohappy to see my striderhobbit joke was taken seriously by most the fact that it was so misunderstood was alot more devastating than people disagreeing with it(after a forum is about debate is it not ![]()
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |