Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinniel
Interesting.
I saw logic in Lommy's reasoning that Rune could be innocent with the theory that Legate "dreamed" him and then Lhuna trying to disregard that possibility. However I don't think Rune's behavior in itself has been necessarily innocent. Considering he hasn't been heavily discussed here toDay, I wonder if the QT is reading into something we're not seeing.
I'm not sure if I'm ready to follow the QT vote toDay, but I definitely think he's worth taking another look at.
|
Now that you mention it, I guess you could read me and
Lhuna's exchange as
Lhuna trying to look good by pointing out a flaw in my reasoning, while it didn't really work because it didn't look like a flaw to anyone who didn't know
Rune is a wolf?
If
Rune is a wolf, I would hazard a guess that
THE Ka is too. Remember how she compared me and
Lhuna's arguments (in a manner that I can't call anything but weird) and came to the conclusion that mine is better? How convenient if
Rune was her packmate and she was basically saying "shh
Lhuna, let the innocents faultily conclude our packmate is innocent".
edit: xed with everyone