Quote:
Originally Posted by Macalaure
Boro's “innocent Freudian slip” is a red flag I didn't notice before. The way I see it, it was either an innocent joke, or a not-innocent Freudian slip. Or am I seeing something wrong?
|
It was rushed wording on my part. With the DL closing down, I was trying to give a quick summary to
the phantom to answer why
Agan was attracting that many votes.
Morm first reacted to
Agan's "killing all the Europeans" in what seemed like a joking fashion (I hurriedly phrased that as "innocent Freudian slip"). And then
Lommy has explained that her suspicions weren't based on the slip itself, but
Agan's reaction to it.
Quote:
As for why:
Agan made would could have been a slip, Lommy pointed it out, and they argued back and forth about whether it was until everyone else wanted to write them both off. I've done that sort of thing with a packmate myself, before.~Rikae
|
I'm not sure what two pack mates would gain by that argument on Day 1. I would think the fact that we wouldn't know anyone's role upon their death would make wake mate-on-mate voting less likely, since there really is no confirmation on what looks dubious/wolvish in a lynch until at least a day later. And I would also think with the threat of a rival pack that would be gunning for wolves, that the internal dynamics of a pack would be really tight-knit.
It was
Morm who first pointed out
Agan's slip, and
Lommy went with
Agan's reaction to
morm as the most suspicious thing she found on Day 1. So, I think it would implicate
morm more as a possible pack mate than
Lommy. (That is,
mormwolf trying to point something out and be helpful, but not expecting much to come of it)