Quote:
Originally Posted by Loslote
Well, but if you're a lion looking for a seer on Night 2, that might be the best you can get in terms of seer candidates. G55 suspected Volo above and beyond almost everyone else, and the one person she put him level with had a lot more reasoning behind his placing than Volo did, which makes her suspicion of him noteworthy, and noteworthy suspicion of someone who actually is a lion is eye-catching to the lions. I could see them basing their Night-kill off that.
EDIT: xed with Mac
|
If you're a lion on Night 2 with no better leads on the seer than "someone suspected one of us in a list in an ordinary way", killing that person is a good way to create a trail back to yourself to kill what's probably (and was) an ordo. Not wise. A lot of people threw around vague suspicions on Day 1, as usual, without being seers. After all, the odds are against the seer's first dream being a baddie, in general, on Day 1.
Nope, I don't think it was an attempt on the seer at all. I think perhaps that was the false trail they hoped to set out for us - look how many people are insisting on it, even while admitting there was nothing particularly seerish about
Gal!
The most seerish comment was from our actual seer, about
Mac or about her list of trusted people, though even that isn't much. Still,
Boro,
Kit,
Nerwen,
Mac and
I are all fairly likely early seer dreams.
Funny thought - perhaps the bear tried to kill a lion, and the lions tried to kill the bear?
At any rate, I really think we ought to look at the people who are playing it safe, people the 'trail', such as it is, conveniently bypasses.
Reading quickly over yesterDay,
Eomer's posting struck me as very safe, basically just amplifying things that were already being said and bantering a bit.
Lottie,
Kit and
Inzil's votes were fishy (so was
Eomer's).
Boro, of all people, is sleeping under the reindeer. I really have a feeling the Lannisters are sitting in the corner right now and enjoying the show.