Quote:
Originally Posted by Inziladun
True. My point though is that we know Shasta was innocent, and I see no reason for an innocent to falsely claim to be Amandil. Like I said, that defeats the purpose of the role.
|
I really don't think anyone doubts that Shasta was Amandil. I put him as that in my list because I think it's pretty much agreed that that was the case. But since the Moddess said she wouldn't give any information about gifted roles then she didn't.
I think we can move on from this discussion (which isn't really a discussion, just the three of us agreeing), because it's pretty clear you're not going to be forced to retract your 'dream'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the phantom
But of course, if we use the "proven" standard, then Elendil can send a dream to anyone as he himself never dreams thus he cannot "know" anything. 
(The intent is clear, of course. Just having fun.) |
This is totally going to turn into a philosophical discussion, isn't it? Where's
Noggie when you need to discuss epistemology?
edit: x-ed since my last