Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sally
As for the seer bit, I would have done the same thing. In fact I did, last game, in order to save Skip. But I usually wouldn't do that if I didn't think the seer was in danger, or if I didn't have a darn good reason otherwise. So I don't know.
|
I haven't forgotten last game– but that was such a different situation I didn't think it was even worth taking into account.
I
am frustrated with
phantom– less with the actual ploy, whatever it is, than with his attitude that nothing he does should be questioned.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sally
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasticle
But in answer to your intimation that I would rather Sally have been lynched yesterday than Lottie - Yes, I would have. But Lottie being evil doesn't exonerate Sally in the slightest - in fact I'm more suspicious of her now than I was - so I don't see why you brought it up.
|
Babe, you're not making sense. I understand your piece about Phantom, and agree with it actually, though that's just sort of who he is, but to say that you'd rather I was lynched than Lottie? You would have learned nothing. Well, you would have, in that an innocent would have been lynched and, when Lottie did get lynched and was proven guilty, you would have had a lot to look at in regards to the first Day. But saying "I wish we hadn't Fenris'd someone" is never okay to say. Never. Sure, say "We should lynch Sally and see what happens and what we can learn with both of them dead" but you can't say you'd rather I was dead than a proven elf. I can't understand why you would say this unless you were one too. Sorry, kid, but it's true. |
Er– hang on.
I thought he meant, "
YesterDay I would have rather
Sally had been lynched", not "I
now wish
Lottie hadn't been lynched". You reckon
that's what he meant?
