Quote:
|
Originally Posted by phantom
There's a reason I made that comment about Gil. If you're innocent, then you'd do well to just agree with it and move on.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by phantom
I'm just letting him know that I have a good reason for saying it and that it is meant to benefit the innocent, therefore if he is innocent he should let it stand.
|
First of all, I don't like that "If you are innocent, you'll do as I say and be content with my better judgement". To me, meekly following
phantom's ideas without questioning them first seems more like the behaviour of a wolf than of an innocent.
Phantom's phrasing looks like blackmailing of sorts - like "If you don't agree with me, I will think you are a wolf." As for me, I don't see that mysterious reason he is talking about at all and would like to remind mr.
phantom that even if you yourself know you are innocent, we others don't and have no reason to trust you. Now I don't think you are a wolf nor do I suspect
Gil, but if I suspected either of you that argument wouldn't sway my opinion.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
And knowing that tp will now truly be ok as an advisor, I feel fine leaving him out of a seat this time through.
|
Excuse me,
Boro - though I don't suspect
phantom either, I honestly don't know how come you are so convinced about his innocence. You treat him like a known innocent, and I'd love to know why.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Who does that leave?
Shasta, sally, Gwath, the phantom, Gil and myself?
What do you think tp?
|
If we are talking about the "experienced veterans" click, this is certainly a good example. Why ask only
phantom, why not ask the other four as well? It looks as if only
phantom's opinion was worth considering. Sorry, I just tend not to like this kind of phrasing.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eönwë
She gives you a reason to uspect her yet she's innocent?
As for the second, in WW people usually use slip to mean a Freudian Slip, so that confused me a bit. Do you just mean her confusion?
|
Like you said later, I mentioned this quote before; and like I believe I said in that post, I guess that was a pure typo. We'll see what
Lommy says when she gets back, though.
Other than that,
Rune brings good points and seems genuine, I have a good feeling about him now that I've read more of his posts. I didn't understand
Boro's bologna-thing, but I trust it was nothing too important.
Is anyone else around? If yes, I'll hang around to discuss with that someone. If not, I'll go writing an essay on The Picture of Dorian Gray.