Mormegil, I agree with you somewhat on Feanor, but would add the caveat that he was a brilliant general in times of war, with that crucial one Lionheart-like weakness-lack of self-preservation. I also understand his motives for "cutting himself off from the Valar", as splendidly expressed by him when he answers Manwe's herald. And the Kinslaying, though a terrible thing to initiate, has to be seen in the light of Finwe's death and Feanor's longing for revenge.
I would disagree entirely on Denethor.
It seems to me that we see all of Melkor's humiliations, because he's the baddie. That still doesn't mean we can neglect his achievements-if they can be called that, as they are all negative. Supreme among these for me is his mastery of treachery-twice against Maedhros (including the Nirnaeth), infinitely against Hurin's family, and against Turgon through Maeglin.
Ar-Pharazon is an excellent choice.
I don't actually think much of Helm Hammerhand. Belligerently stirring up racial feuds which led to the near destruction of Rohan.
Earendil, whatever else he was, proved a poor ruler to his people.
But surely Sauron takes the biscuit. I mean-putting his power into a ring? That's just comical...
I like this thread, and will return to it when I have more. Have we already got a positive one? I might ressurect if I find it.
__________________
Among the friendly dead, being bad at games did not seem to matter
-Il Lupo Fenriso
|