Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
04-23-2010, 05:07 AM | #1 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 602
|
Couldn't Niniel and Turin have worked it out?
.
One of my favorite features in Barrow-Downs is the ever-changing quotes on the top right corner, and today it showed this passage: Quote:
I know that she was pregnant (and thus her hormones might have added to her impetuousness), but couldn't Niniel the Tearmaiden pause and assess her situation? I mean, brother marries sister in lots of cultures (especially in royal families, to keep the bloodline pure), And I suspect that Niniel didn't receive much of ethical or moral sermons on sexual purity from Morwen while on the road; Even if she did, nowhere on Silmarillion does Eru or the Valar state: "thou shalt not marry thine own brethren". Why would it be a sin? It would be weird, but not Oedipal marry-your-mother weird. Besides, isn't suicide/infanticide sinful as well? Don't you think Niniel and Turin might have worked out a viable solution other than double-suicide to this tangled web of deceit, if Niniel realized in time that Turin was unconscious but still alive? Somehow overcome this, together? I know that I'm a sucker for happy endings, but I cannot help but wonder whether Niniel would've killed herself she knew Turin lived. I understand her jumping off a cliff in her despair at her husband's death and the shock of what she found out, But what would Niniel and Turin have done if Niniel knew Turin was alive? (I assume filing for divorce wasn't an option, but still.) . Last edited by Eorl of Rohan; 04-23-2010 at 05:31 AM. |
|
04-23-2010, 09:52 AM | #2 | ||||||||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,036
|
Quote:
Quote:
In Tolkien's world, such intermarriage seems to be strictly taboo, even without an 'official' decree from the Valar. We see it in the Eldar, with Maeglin: Quote:
And the Dúnedain in Númenor, who took many of their laws and customs from the Elves: Quote:
So there are two examples of close marriages being disallowed, and both those instances merely regard first cousins. Incest between immediate family would have been an even greater horror to those in Middle-earth, at least those of the 'enlightened', in the west. It seems clear that it wasn't the thought of Túrin being dead that drove Níniel to madness, but the knowledge the she was carrying his child. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||||||||
04-23-2010, 10:26 AM | #3 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 602
|
Aw. I was hoping against hope that there was no reference about taboo of marriage between close kinds in Tolkien's works, but I guess that's dashed.
I should have liked to dream of a possible happy future for Turin and Niniel. |
04-23-2010, 11:38 AM | #4 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for suicide - personally, I've never understood why this is so widely considered sinful or immoral. Tragic, certainly, but how is voluntarily ending one's own life sinful? However, that's just my view; I expect Tolkien would have agreed that it was sinful. One does wonder what he thought the 'correct' response would have been on both Nienor's and Turin's parts. |
||
04-23-2010, 11:43 AM | #5 |
Pilgrim Soul
Join Date: May 2004
Location: watching the wonga-wonga birds circle...
Posts: 9,449
|
There is certainly a knowledge of keeping bloodlines pure in Tolkien especially with the Dunedain where the purer houses in Gondor are the longest lived and their lifetime is less than those of the North because of mingling with lesser stock. Of course in the real world inbreeding is much more likely to cause a diminishment in health and mind.
__________________
“But Finrod walks with Finarfin his father beneath the trees in Eldamar.”
Christopher Tolkien, Requiescat in pace |
04-23-2010, 12:35 PM | #6 | ||
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for suicide being seen as sinful: there is a very good logic behind it, in my opinion, and I am saying that as a person whose close friend had actually commited suicide. The main underlying point would be that it is not just your personal problem and decision. It is ultimately an utterly cowardly and selfish deed, thinking that "with being dead, I don't have to worry about anything anymore". But it's not only about oneself, but also about the other people who knew that person, and who are still left here living their lives. That friend of mine wiped out all knowledge of his existence, like throwing away things from his home and erasing all files from his computer, making it seem as if he never existed. But to all those people who knew him, of course, it was not as easy as that to just forget that he existed. Namely his parents. The point is, there is a certain network of people around everybody and he is in some way responsible to them. This is further emphasised also by the classic religious explanation of suicide being sinful because your life is not ultimately yours to take because it also was not you to give it to yourself in the first place. The general explanation (and I think shared by more religious worldviews, and in my opinion not impossible to adapt even by non-religiously thinking people) is that you are born here, which is not just a random privilege, but it puts you in a certain situation with certain responsibilities. (And from this point, you can start thinking about basically everything in this world in a different perspective, I am not going to start on that here, you can surely imagine on your own.)
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
||
04-24-2010, 07:21 PM | #7 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 602
|
|
04-24-2010, 07:49 PM | #8 |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
Technically, I don't think it is. But that's a discussion we probably don't want to get into here.
|
04-26-2010, 08:45 AM | #9 | ||
Doubting Dwimmerlaik
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Heaven's basement
Posts: 2,466
|
Quote:
Quote:
Niniel, knowing now that her child was Turin's, may have believed that her child, being in the line of Hurin (not half, but from both sides), would allow Morgoth to continue his tortuous game with the next generation of this sorrowful family. In her despair, but also, like her family, in defiance of Morgoth, she sacrificed herself and the life of her child to thwart the Dark Lord's plans. Who knows what life this child would have had? Thralldom? A Dark Child under Morgoth, used as a weapon against the Free Elves and Men? Does this sanction suicide or homicide? Not in the least. This was a special person in special circumstances. Didn't see anything proscribing suicide in Arda. Tolkien, being a Christian in our world, had other beliefs outside his created world. And it is believed that his God is a god of love and grace, which all surely need, even those like Niniel.
__________________
There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.
|
||
|
|