Movie Characters Revisited: Gollum/Smeagol

[Boromir88]

A few questions about Gollum's character this week, but first I wanted to point out I think Andy Serkis was a great casting choice. They could have given Gollum pants though, not sure why they just strapped a loincloth on him.

Speaking of Serkis, in interviews he has often compared the Ring to a very strong drug addiction (or more generally to any strong addiction). Too simple? I'm not sure if I'm entirely happy with this comparison, because it seems too simple, but it is still accurate enough.

Another thing that comes through with Gollum in the movies is an apparent split personality. There is "Gollum" and "Smeagol" and one scene in particular where the two personalities are arguing with each other. Again it seems simplified, but I haven't read the books in quite a while to truly remember if this existed in the books.

Last thing I noticed here is I think the movies make you believe (or try to) in Gollum's redemption more than the books. In the books, really only Frodo appears to be holding out the chance, and actually displays a trust towards Gollum. Sam never trusts him, neither does Faramir. Aragorn admits to be rough with him when he was captured, and Gandalf seems to think more as a utilitarian with Gollum. Gollum still has some "part to play." He may still be of use, not that he necessarily believes Gollum can be healed. I think on-screen though, until Gollum believes Frodo betrayed him, the movies do a good job of in TTT showing the possibility of a redemption, or healing. One that really doesn't seem possible in the books, even though I suppose it exists.