The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > The Books
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2003, 11:35 AM   #1
Olorin_TLA
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gardens of Lórien, Valinor.
Posts: 420
Olorin_TLA has just left Hobbiton.
Sting SPice for the Balrog-Wings Soup...(not seen this anywhere before)

So since I've never seen anyone mention this, I hope nobody minds me saying this "brainwave". [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]


In the Books of Lost Tales and pre-LotR writings, Morgoth greatly desires the secret of flight. It’s mentioned quite a lot: how he tortures eagles, hoping to extract the secret of flight, etc, because neither Morgoth nor any of his followers could fly or knew how to. I beleive this is specifically stated in HoMe II, and probably other places.

I guess that rules out flight, and wings, because the impression gained is that Morgoth couldn’t make wings either: indeed, it is only towards the end of his reign that he discovers the secrets of flight, and so creates the Winged Dragons...no mention of creation of Winged Balrogs anywhere, and since they couldn’t fly before (because nout could) that in my mind settles that issue.

Of course, that leaves the problem of Vampires flying, but Tolkien’s views on Morgoth and his servants did change dramatically during and after writing LotR...


(In case anyone doesn’t know, Tolkien’s views on the Enemies, including Balrogs, were incredibly different before he wrote LotR. In the pre-LotR, Book of Lost Tales world, Balrogs were terrible foes and fire, but werne’t Maia (afaik) and though extrmely hard to kill since Lef Lords could slay them, there’s little chance that Gandalf would have had as much trouble as he did with his. During LotR, Balrogs changed in Tolkien’s mind. This is furhter shown that after LotR, when he was revising the Silmarillion, the Balrogs suddenly became much more powerful, and far, far fewer in number (around 7 he reckoned at one point), and they were now terrible Maia like Sauron. During these revisions Tolkien mentions Glorfindel’s duel with a Balrog, then crosses out the word Balrog and replaces it with Demon, reffering from then on to Glorfindel fighting a Demon, NOT a Balrog. Tolkien’s vision of Balrogs therefore changed from elite horde to extremely rare and practically unstoppable nightmares during the writing of LotR.)


Soo...what's this mean for me? Well, maybe "for me" is the wrong expression, seeing as we all ahve our own views as to the Wings Things. [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]
It would seem that this is indeed fairly compelling evidence for non-wingness, as nowhere in the Later Silmarillion etc afaik are there any descriptions/metaphors about flying...HOWEVER, becuase Vamps could fly even when this pre-LotR idea was floating around of torturing birds to gian the secret of flight (and may have sitll remained) it may not be a compeeling argument: Vamps are maia, as far as I know, and so are Balrogs, so even if Morgoth didn't learn how to breed/"engineer" flying creatures they still could have (mind you, originally Balrogs weren't maiar...but I don't think Vamps were either [img]smilies/frown.gif[/img] ).

I didn't claim to solve the issue! This could be viewed as very inconclusive indeed, but on the other hand maybe it's enough to get you to belive in one side of the Balrogs-Wings Debate/War/Armaggedon. [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]

(Disclaimer: I haven't stolen part of your life making you read this post, it's a little thing you can think about. [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img] )
__________________
"For I am Olórin! And Olórin means me!"

ELENDIL! - Join "Forth Tolkiengas!"
Olorin_TLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 12:24 PM   #2
Arwen1858
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gondor
Posts: 516
Arwen1858 has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Arwen1858
Sting

Just because they can't fly doesn't mean they don't have wings! I'm not quite sure what I think of the issue, but just thought I'd throw that in.
Arwen
__________________
Will Turner: "This is either madness or brilliance."
Jack Sparrow: "It's remarkable how often those two traits coincide." ~ Pirates of the Caribbean
Arwen1858 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 12:30 PM   #3
Olorin_TLA
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gardens of Lórien, Valinor.
Posts: 420
Olorin_TLA has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

True, but I was thinking that it wouldn't make sense for them to ahve them; the dragons, after all, didn't until the secret of flight was discovered by Morgoth.
__________________
"For I am Olórin! And Olórin means me!"

ELENDIL! - Join "Forth Tolkiengas!"
Olorin_TLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 01:01 PM   #4
Aiwendil
Late Istar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
Aiwendil is a guest at the Prancing Pony.Aiwendil is a guest at the Prancing Pony.
Sting

To be honest, I don't think this makes any difference to the wing debate. It seems fairly certain in any case that BoLT Balrogs didn't fly. But that is all that this evidence supports.

Nothing from the Book of Lost Tales can provide significant evidence either way on post-LotR Balrogs.

By the way, what chapter of BoLT is that from? I don't quite recall it - it's been a while since I've read the thing straight through.
Aiwendil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 02:40 PM   #5
Balin999
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: East of the Sun, West of the Moon
Posts: 521
Balin999 has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via ICQ to Balin999
Sting

Hereby I state once and for all that I will forever believe that Balrogs had wings and that no argument whatsoever will ever change that opinion, unless that argument is found/brought in by myself. The reason is: I WANT to believe that Balrogs had wings.
Now you all go ahead with your next argument that is pretty useless because there will always be arguments on both sides and where no conclusion will be found.
__________________
...Nichts ist gelber als Gelb selber...

...The opposite of courage in our society is not cowardice, but conformity...

...Everything is possible, except to ski through a revolving door...
Balin999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 05:00 PM   #6
Arwen1858
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gondor
Posts: 516
Arwen1858 has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Arwen1858
Sting

Ok, after going back and reading the part in FotR one more time, I believe Balrogs do have wings. I was leaning in that direction already, but I do think they have wings. Just thought I'd share what I think!
Arwen
__________________
Will Turner: "This is either madness or brilliance."
Jack Sparrow: "It's remarkable how often those two traits coincide." ~ Pirates of the Caribbean
Arwen1858 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 06:15 PM   #7
Lord of Angmar
Tyrannus Incorporalis
 
Lord of Angmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the North
Posts: 833
Lord of Angmar has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

Balin, your statement seems to provide a precise definition of ignorance: unwillingness to believe in or take seriously an opinion that goes against your own, whether it is logical or not. I do not mean to be mean in this remark, I have just always thought it very important to keep an open mind.

As for the prior discussion, I have but one question:
Why would balrogs have wings if they could not fly?
__________________
...where the instrument of intelligence is added to brute power and evil will, mankind is powerless in its own defence.
Lord of Angmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 06:53 PM   #8
The Barrow-Wight
Night In Wight Satin
 
The Barrow-Wight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 4,058
The Barrow-Wight is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
White-Hand

Balrog wings have been discussed elsewhere in the general sense, so all posts here should be directed strictly toward the first post of this thread and its premise.

Also, no flaming! '... precise definition of ignorance...' is not acceptable. Keep a civil tone in all Barrow-Downs discussion, please.

That is all (for now).
__________________
The Barrow-Wight
The Barrow-Wight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 07:55 PM   #9
Arwen1858
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gondor
Posts: 516
Arwen1858 has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Arwen1858
Sting

Quote:
As for the prior discussion, I have but one question:
Why would balrogs have wings if they could not fly?
Ostriches, Emus, Penguins, and numerous other birds have wings, but lack the ability to fly. Just because a creature can't fly is not a valid reason to say that it definitely can't have wings.
Olorin_TLA, I am glad you posted that quote because I haven't read those books yet, so never read that before. So at least I know for sure that balrogs don't fly.
__________________
Will Turner: "This is either madness or brilliance."
Jack Sparrow: "It's remarkable how often those two traits coincide." ~ Pirates of the Caribbean
Arwen1858 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 08:26 PM   #10
Voralphion
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sharkey's End
Posts: 267
Voralphion has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

True, flightless birds do have wings, but that is because they evolved from birds that could fly and they still have wings although they are now useless. Since balrogs were maiar and did not evolve their form, but instead took their form themselves, I do not see the point in having wings that they cannot fly with and would be without a purpose.
__________________
His sword was long his lance was keen
His shining helm afar was seen
The countless stars of heavens field
Were mirrored in his silver shield
Voralphion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 10:32 PM   #11
Arwen1858
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gondor
Posts: 516
Arwen1858 has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Arwen1858
Sting

I don't believe in evolution, and Tolkien was also a Christian, not an evolutionist. So, if he believed some birds were created with wings, but without the ability to fly, there is a possibility that's how he made balrogs. I'm not saying that's the case; it's just a possibility. Maybe Tolkien didn't mean for balrogs to have wings. I think that this matter of balrogs having wings will be discussed as long as there are LotR fans to discuss it, and there will never be a set answer, as Tolkien obviously isn't going to be writing anymore.
__________________
Will Turner: "This is either madness or brilliance."
Jack Sparrow: "It's remarkable how often those two traits coincide." ~ Pirates of the Caribbean
Arwen1858 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 12:00 AM   #12
Iarhen
Wight
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Laurelindorenan
Posts: 225
Iarhen has just left Hobbiton.
Silmaril

Im gonna sound like such a newbie, but Im so surprised to hear that Morgoth tortured Eagles to take out of them the secret of flight... No wonder why Thorondor hated him so much... Were in the books is such a thing stated?

BTW... I know this is way off topic, but why and when did Thorondor, Lord of Eagles, died?
__________________
"In place of a Dark Lord you will have a Queen! Not dark but beatiful and terrible as the Dawn! Treacherous as the sea! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair!"
--- Galadriel when tempted by the One Ring.
Iarhen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 12:18 AM   #13
Mister Underhill
Dread Horseman
 
Mister Underhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,752
Mister Underhill has been trapped in the Barrow!
Sting

Quote:
So at least I know for sure that balrogs don't fly.
No you don't. As Aiwendil has quite rightly pointed out, the old BolT stories are ancient history in terms of the development of the Legendarium and especially LotR. Olorin_TLA's inference is interesting, but not at all conclusive in the wings debate.
Mister Underhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 01:00 AM   #14
Arwen1858
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gondor
Posts: 516
Arwen1858 has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Arwen1858
Question

Quote:
No you don't. As Aiwendil has quite rightly pointed out, the old BolT stories are ancient history in terms of the development of the Legendarium and especially LotR.
oh, ok. Sorry! I know I sound like I don't know very much about it, but I've only read LotR and The Hobbit, and am about to start the Silm. SO I just figured BolT was supposed to be fact. So, did Tolkien mean for it to be more legend than fact? (by fact, I mean as in what really happened in ME) And what exactly do you mean by the Legendarium? Please help me out a bit!
Arwen
__________________
Will Turner: "This is either madness or brilliance."
Jack Sparrow: "It's remarkable how often those two traits coincide." ~ Pirates of the Caribbean
Arwen1858 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 01:30 AM   #15
Eurytus
Wight
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 179
Eurytus has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

I am new to this board so apologies if I am rehashing old ground but I always thought that the fact that the Balrog had physical wings (as opposed to wings of shadow) could be demonstrated as wrong by a look at the what we can calculate about the size of the Balrog and the size of the wings.
Basically the Balrog could not have been much beyond 14 feet tall and the wings would have been somewhere approaching 100 feet wide. The ratios don't work for them to be physical wings.

But wings of shadow, fine.
__________________
"This is the most blatant case of false advertising since my suit against the movie The Neverending Story!"

Lionel Hutz
Eurytus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 04:27 AM   #16
Noxomanus
Wight
 
Noxomanus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 233
Noxomanus has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

I'd like to mention that that are several other uses for wings apart from flying. All kinds of birds use wings to beat opponents in a fight or use them to make themselves look bigger and scare off enemies. Both these uses could have come in handy for a Balrog I think. Also,wings can be used as flippers or as a parasol or to hide chicks but that wouldn't apply to balrog wings i suppose...as for the wings loosing their use in flight in evolution....it would have been a great way to explain balrogs having wings without being able to fly.....but unfortunately,Tolkien didn't believe in evolution like several boarders,including me.It allways strikes me how christian a lot of you are.
__________________
Nothing is evil in the beginning,even Sauron wasn't
Noxomanus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 01:00 PM   #17
Lord of Angmar
Tyrannus Incorporalis
 
Lord of Angmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the North
Posts: 833
Lord of Angmar has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

Quote:
All kinds of birds use wings to beat opponents in a fight or use them to make themselves look bigger and scare off enemies.
True, but in almost all these cases, the birds also use those wings to fly.

The argument that Tolkien was not an evolutionist (which of course I fully believe) can be used to support either side, as one could assume that Balrogs would not have been given wings had those wings been of no use to them. I hardly think they would be used as a scare tactic, since that is a feature associated with non-predatiorial birds who mean to scary away invaders and predators, whereas Balrogs would already be imposing enough without wings and they do not need to scare anything away. Since Balrogs used hand-held weapons of flame, wings would have no purpose as a means of defense. Tolkien never describes wings at all, let alone their use as some form of defense or weaponry. Although I am not averse to the idea of Balrogs with wings, I think that, were it proven that Balrogs were incapable of flight, it would be entirely illogical to assume that they had wings.
__________________
...where the instrument of intelligence is added to brute power and evil will, mankind is powerless in its own defence.
Lord of Angmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 01:54 PM   #18
Olorin_TLA
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gardens of Lórien, Valinor.
Posts: 420
Olorin_TLA has just left Hobbiton.
Tolkien

Arwen, the Book of Lost Tales was Tolkien's original "version" of the Silmarillion...however, a lot of things did change. Seing as Balrog wings are such a vague area, however, I still think it's an interesting quote, though by no means conclusive for either side of the debate. [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]

Quote:
don't believe in evolution, and Tolkien was also a Christian, not an evolutionist
I haven't seen anything saying he wasn't, but if he did actually say he was, obviously that supercedes what I'm about to say.
But firstly it's perfectly possible to be a devout religious person and still believe in evolution...religious accounts and evolution don't contradict each other, unles you literally beleive the world was made in 7 days, and Tolkien didn;t beleive that (see my next point).

Secondly, in Letters someone asked if the Winged Nazgul Steeds were like Pteranosaurs. He responds that he hadn't had Pteranosaurs in mind, but that they could be similar (maybe related?) , and says that the "almsot mythic prehistory" being discovered of the time of the Dinosaurs was marvelous and fascinating. Anyway, seeing as he beleived, and was impressed by, prehistoric creatures, he must have beleived the wolrd to be ancient (unlike what the Bible says: hence the reason he couldn't have been a literal Old Testament guy). This, coupled with his general attitdue in his letters of non-fundamentalism (if he was one, he would have burned the Silm and LotR, firstly for having Eru as God...) leads me to beleive that he wouldn;t have rejected evolution.
Of course, we can;t tell for certain either way, but I think basing the argument of "Balrogs may have had flightless wings because Tolkien didn;t beleive in evolution" is an extremely flimsy argument.

Heheh...little Balrog chicks being protected by wings. Cute. [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img]
__________________
"For I am Olórin! And Olórin means me!"

ELENDIL! - Join "Forth Tolkiengas!"
Olorin_TLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 06:21 PM   #19
Keeper of Dol Guldur
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Keeper of Dol Guldur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 315, CNY Boys and girls.
Posts: 405
Keeper of Dol Guldur has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

Just because Morgoth couldn't make any of his creations have the gift of flight, didn't mean the Maiar he had corrupted couldn't. After all, neither the Balrogs, Sauron, Thuringwethil and many other creatures weren't of his making at all. Of course, eventually he unlocked the secret of flying forces, but by then it was too late. But before that, sure his followers may have had the gift.
__________________
"I come from yonder...Have you seen Baggins? Baggins has left, he is coming. He is not far away. I wish to find him. If he passes will you tell me? I will come back with gold." - Khamul the Easterling
Keeper of Dol Guldur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 07:24 PM   #20
Nilpaurion Felagund
Scion of The Faithful
 
Nilpaurion Felagund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The brink, where hope and despair are akin. [The Philippines]
Posts: 5,430
Nilpaurion Felagund is a guest at the Prancing Pony.Nilpaurion Felagund is a guest at the Prancing Pony.
Feel free to bash me, smash me, or just counter my argument, but this is what I believe...

Balrogs have wings, true, as seen in the Bridge of Khazad-dum. But don't you think that this Balrog, after being cooped up in the mountains for two ages, lost his ability to fly? Sure, Khazad-dum would be a pretty huge city for dwarves, but it doesn't have enough space for a gigantic Balrog to fly. His wing "muscle"(or whatever was it that made the wing move) deteriorated, hence, he couldn't use it as he fell throught the chasm...

And then I counter myself: What about Glorfindel's foe? He(she...it...whatever the gender was) didn't fly?

Wala lang!
->The True Son of Finrod, and of Amarie the Vanyar

[ October 08, 2003: Message edited by: Nilpaurion Felagund ]
__________________
フェンリス鴨 (Fenrisu Kamo)
The plot, cut, defeated.
I intend to copy this sig forever - so far so good...
Nilpaurion Felagund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 07:30 PM   #21
Lord of Angmar
Tyrannus Incorporalis
 
Lord of Angmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the North
Posts: 833
Lord of Angmar has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

Nilpaurion you are talking about the movie, which is not a definitive answer to the question about Balrogs but merely an artist's interpretation. Peter Jackson also made the Balrog much bigger than Tolkien described, so his work cannot be construed as supporting evidence in this debate.
__________________
...where the instrument of intelligence is added to brute power and evil will, mankind is powerless in its own defence.
Lord of Angmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 07:46 PM   #22
Nilpaurion Felagund
Scion of The Faithful
 
Nilpaurion Felagund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The brink, where hope and despair are akin. [The Philippines]
Posts: 5,430
Nilpaurion Felagund is a guest at the Prancing Pony.Nilpaurion Felagund is a guest at the Prancing Pony.
Quote:
...it was like a great shadow, in the middle of which was a dark form, of man-shape maybe, yet greater...and the shadow about it reached out like two vast wing(wait)...
OK, so I was wrong about the wings...but the first part, about it being greater. Now greater means a lot of things; more powerful, bigger, etc. But I think: since the man form was the one being described, I think it was about it size...but then again, maybe I'm wrong... [img]smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img] [img]smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img] [img]smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img]

Wala lang!
->The True Son of Finrod, and of Amarie the Vanyar
__________________
フェンリス鴨 (Fenrisu Kamo)
The plot, cut, defeated.
I intend to copy this sig forever - so far so good...
Nilpaurion Felagund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2003, 03:05 PM   #23
Secret Fire
Animated Skeleton
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Oregon State University
Posts: 47
Secret Fire has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Secret Fire
Silmaril

Quote:
the "almsot mythic prehistory" being discovered of the time of the Dinosaurs was marvelous and fascinating. Anyway, seeing as he beleived, and was impressed by, prehistoric creatures, he must have beleived the wolrd to be ancient (unlike what the Bible says: hence the reason he couldn't have been a literal Old Testament guy).
What do you mean? Dinosaurs are in the Bible and Christians believe that the earth is old enough to have contained these animals at some point in our history and they died out. The world is ancient, but fossils aren't exactly as old as the carbon dating would suggest (I figured out the physics once, but I won't bore you here) there are too many variables and assumptions to definitively place a fossil at a certain age. As for the Balrog wing controversy, the balrog at least in Khazad Dum had shaddow spreading like wings, but this does not rule out any other balrogs from having wings, especially since maia could take any form they desired.

[ October 09, 2003: Message edited by: Secret Fire ]
__________________
Say my name and I'm gone,
who am I?
Secret Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2003, 04:31 PM   #24
Lord of Angmar
Tyrannus Incorporalis
 
Lord of Angmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the North
Posts: 833
Lord of Angmar has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

The Balrogs could not take any form they desired.

Where are dinosaurs mentioned in the Bible?

[ October 09, 2003: Message edited by: Lord of Angmar ]
__________________
...where the instrument of intelligence is added to brute power and evil will, mankind is powerless in its own defence.
Lord of Angmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2003, 08:28 AM   #25
Sharkû
Hungry Ghoul
 
Sharkû's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,721
Sharkû has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

Yes, enough dinosaurs, please.

Seriously, I mean it.

[ October 10, 2003: Message edited by: Sharkû ]
Sharkû is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:33 PM   #26
Elianna
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ad finem itineris
Posts: 384
Elianna has just left Hobbiton.
Tolkien

Sorry Sharku, I can't resist:
Lord of Angmar:
Dinosaurs are mentioned in Job chapters 40-41. 1st God talks about His behemoth (which I've heard Bible scholars say is like a brontosaurus), then He speaks of His leviathan, which is a fire breathing dragon it seems. Cool huh?

As for Balrogs: I personally don't think they had wings. Glorfindel kills one by making it fall down, go boom, and Gandalf almost kills one by making it fall down, go boom.
I haven't read much of the rest of the post, so I don't really have anything intelligent to add about Balrogs, sorry.
Elianna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:55 PM   #27
Thulorongil
Haunting Spirit
 
Thulorongil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: wherever the road may take me
Posts: 97
Thulorongil has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Thulorongil
Sting

I haven't posted much on this topic before, though it is something that I've thought about. I do not really know where I stand in the debate, however.

I have a couple thoughts to share, of consequence or not.
Olorin-you make a very good point that makes a lot of sense. Why would Morgoth do something that really wasn't necessary or beneficial? There have been many good suggestions as to reasons for him to, but one large one that I have to say is the intimidation factor. Throughout Tolkien's work, evil beings and people do many things to frighten and daunt their enemies, and it usually works pretty well. Animals in nature now--and people, too--use this strategy as well. It would certainly dampen most people's spirits or even discourage them from challenging a foe that appears to be very large and with characteristics that would give it an advantage. Wings definitely add to size and the way something looks (in a good or bad way) and also usually give the wing-ee (or being that has the wings) extra skills or power. What if you attacked a flightless winged but Balrog but didn't know it couldn't fly? Might you think that it would be able to attack you, defend itself, escape, or do something else with its wings? It would at least look pretty scary. But wouldn't it look scary already? (Look, I'm contradicting myself again! If I ramble too much, just ignore me...) A demon of fire already well-known for being formidable, and well, a Balrog! Would it need extra unwieldy appendages just to add to a quality it already had?

I have one more point to add in opposition to wings:
Quote:
His enemy halted again, facing him, and the shadow about it reached out like two vast wings.
This is from FotR--there isn't much description in the texts I have of other Balrog battles. What struck me is that Tolkien, the master of words and their usage, usually doesn't say something needlessly. In this scene he used the words "like wings" in his description. Might this mean that he intended to only describe the shape and size of the shadow, rather than the Balrog? Perhaps if he'd meant to say that wings could actually be seen it would say "as wings" or the shadow and flame "surrounding wings" or "Gandalf and the members of the Fellowship could see that the Balrog had two distinct wings on his back and made mental notes to tell everyone at home about it." I don't know...maybe I shouldn't be trying to comprehend what went on inside the professor's mind...
__________________
I sit beside the fire and think of people long ago,
And people who will see a world that I shall never know.
Thulorongil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:58 PM   #28
lore_master
Wight
 
lore_master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 116
lore_master has just left Hobbiton.
As an answer to the "If Balrogs couldnt fly, why would they have wings?" question.

Blarogs could take any shape or form they wanted, so in theory, they could have chose/made form that had wings, thinking that with wings, they would be able to fly.
but they did not take into account that no one could fly if they did not know the secrect of flight, so the wings would basicly have been useless.

A baby bird has wings when it is born, but they do not know how to fly.

Personally i think they did have wings but they do not know how to fly.
__________________
As you go the way of life, you will see a great chasm. Jump. It is not as wide as you think
lore_master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 02:39 PM   #29
Mister Underhill
Dread Horseman
 
Mister Underhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,752
Mister Underhill has been trapped in the Barrow!
Quote:
What struck me is that Tolkien, the master of words and their usage, usually doesn't say something needlessly. In this scene he used the words "like wings" in his description. Might this mean that he intended to only describe the shape and size of the shadow, rather than the Balrog?
As fate would have it, the professor used this “like-shadow” construction on numerous occasions. Some examples are here. I think the whole “simile” argument falls apart fairly quickly if you widen your scope beyond those few sentences in “The Bridge of Khazad-dûm”.
Mister Underhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 07:22 AM   #30
Hot, crispy nice hobbit
Wight
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Troll's larder
Posts: 195
Hot, crispy nice hobbit has just left Hobbiton.
Er, I SO know that I am gonna be burnt at the stake for this.

Why couldn't the so called Balrog wings be FINS?

Quote:
"Long I fell, and he fell with me. His fire was about me. I was burned. Then we plunged into the deep water and all was dark.... His fire was quenched, but now he was a thing of slime, stronger than a strangling snake."
Okay, a Balrog, a spirit of Fire no less, fell into the water and was quenched. He definitely could swim, otherwise he would not have died at the top of the Mountain. Now, if Balrogs have huge wings like birds or bats, I don't suppose it would be easy for him to swim in the water. But flappers like those of a penguin or huge fins like those of a devil-fish definitely resemble wings, and they help those creatures swim underwater.

Counter: some sea birds can swim underwater with their wings.
My Answer (for the fun of it): Wings can help to swim for some birds, but fins and flappers are much better for swimming. Besides, isn't it Pippin's itchy fingers with the stone thrown at the well that made the Balrog notice? He may have been knocked on the head while swimming underneath, and was SO peeved that he rushed all the way up to address the wrong. Note that he did not FLY up.

One other point for Balrogs to have FINS is that they are the servant of the Sadistic Biology Professor, Morgoth. Morgoth, throwing contempt at everything that looks cool, decided to further debase the Order of Maia by making embarressing FINs for the majestic spirits of Fire that have followed him. This may be the second vilest deed of Melkor, after the creation of the Orcs...

Balrog to orcs: You guys keep a look out while I go for a dip.
One orc to another: Da boss's feeling fishy today...

Last edited by Hot, crispy nice hobbit; 03-04-2004 at 08:07 AM.
Hot, crispy nice hobbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 01:07 PM   #31
The Saucepan Man
Corpus Cacophonous
 
The Saucepan Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,468
The Saucepan Man has been trapped in the Barrow!
Dark-Eye Diving for Balrogs?

Inventive theory, Hot n' Crispy ...

... but what kind of a crazy, mixed-up Fire Spirit would take a physical form adapted to a life underwater?
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind!
The Saucepan Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 04:42 PM   #32
Lord of Angmar
Tyrannus Incorporalis
 
Lord of Angmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the North
Posts: 833
Lord of Angmar has just left Hobbiton.
That is the most original theory I have heard in the Balrog debate in some time, Hot n' crispy. However, I agree with Saucepan Man about the improbability of a Fire Spirit taking on a form adapted to aquatic life. Also, the description of the wing-shadows of the Balrog in The Bridge of Khazad-dum would, in your theory, call for fins that were disproportionately large, when you consider the average sizes of marine creatures relative to their fin-sizes. Also, historically, it would have been of no advantage for the Balrogs to have fins. They presumably first took their fiery form in or near Utumno, a place where fins would probably be of little use. The Balrogs were captains of Morgoth's armies, marching with the infantry in all of the instances described in The Silmarillion. Fins would probably be a hindrance in battle (or, if not a hindrance, definitely not a help).

It is definitely a fun theory, though.

Quote:
the Sadistic Biology Professor, Morgoth.
Heh heh.

-Angmar
__________________
...where the instrument of intelligence is added to brute power and evil will, mankind is powerless in its own defence.
Lord of Angmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.