![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#81 | ||
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10
![]() |
I don’t know if it’s necessarily a contradiction, but in CoH it was said (and inserted, but as far as I see through the system atm without a number?) that before Gwindor fled from the mines he
Quote:
Quote:
I also find the characterisation of the Enfeng of Belegost as "of troth unmindful" questionable in light of the later conceptions. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
About the dagger:
Good catch! We could of course construct a story to discusse the contradiction away, but cannonical safty would lead to the elimination of the hole passage in the Lay. The implication in CoH is clearly that the short sword that Gwindor got was forged in Angband. But it is not made explicit. Therefore we could assume that the short sword was the dagger or knife and that it was part of the spiols of war and only for repiar in the forge of Angband. Quote:
Respecfuly Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 | |||
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 363
![]() |
Quote:
Maybe it would be better at this point: Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I think you work from an older version for your suggestion. But nonetheless your cirtisim is valid since the chapter break is unchanged. The suggested Point would read thus in our actual version:
Quote:
Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |