Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
02-21-2004, 03:27 AM | #41 | |||||
Deadnight Chanter
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Only way HP can lead a child to the occult is once it is banned, for than it will be much more attractive (ah, how sweet the forbidden fruit is?). As in any other field, it is adults correct/incorrect behavior with regards of anything that may bring damage to a child And, after all, the child is as much human as an adult, and the problem of choice is set before it as well as before any adult. There is no real living for the over protected, I can’t help thinking. The thing you fear, as far as I am to judge, is that HP readers will actually mix up fiction and reality and believe that magic is to be found in our world, and start finding it out and become witches and sorcerers as described by Merriam_Webster (or was it Oxford?) dictionary. But, without correct reaction of its tutors, it may be led to believe there are really green men on Mars, or, as the films assure us, that one can always get away with it if daring enough to rob a bank. But is it not written: Quote:
Quote:
a bit sliced quotes from Tolkien’s On Fairy-Stories, to be found in The Tolkien Reader. (My edition Ballantine Books ISBN 0-345-34506-1, ask for it and you’ll get a good read on it)
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
|||||
02-21-2004, 03:19 PM | #42 | ||
Fair and Cold
|
Theron, perhaps you mis-read my post? I was talking about the fact that a number of Tolkien's characters mis-used their Eru-given powers. Mushroom's original statement was taking the opposite viewpoint.
Quote:
I think the problem with your assessment of the potential dangers of Harry Potter lies within both the supposed nature of children as "innocents" that soak up different ideologies like sponges, rather than young human beings (and, as a Christian, I believe that no human being is innocent) that absorb information through the prism of their own intelligence. The latter view does not neccessarily imply that art introduced at an inappropriate time cannot harm the child (I couldn't imagine, for example, taking my 8-year old brother to a screening of Bertolucci's "The Dreamers" and then expect him not to be scarred for life), but that age-appropriate materials often have curious ways of being incorporated into a child's view of the world. Furthermore, there is the nature of art to deal with. Eminem famously asked: "They say music can alter moods and talk to you/ Well can it load a gun up for you and c0ck it too?" His answer, while not clearing up any potential ambiguity, points out the obtuse nature of the argument, "Well if it can, next time you assault a dude/Just tell the judge it was my fault, and I'll get sued." Quote:
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ |
||
02-21-2004, 07:29 PM | #43 | ||||
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hobbit hole in Western WA
Posts: 31
|
HerenIstarion, I do not think I am mixing fiction and reality anymore. You say that Harry's abilities are a gift from God. That, I think, gets a little closer to mixing then what I was trying to say.
Of course imagination is a wonderful thing. But there is a distinction between healthy, imaginative play (cowboy, knight, hobbit, etc.), and play involving the occult. A witch is a decidedly un-Christian person. Playing witch is not the same as becoming one of course, but all the same it is a decidedly un-Godly game. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Looking at the quotes from the children that were in my last post, I do not think they are harboring some sort of "willing suspension of disbelief." I think that they are actually trying to merge the world of HP and our own world; wishing to produce magic in our own world. Lush, I really don't find HP particularly enriching, but I guess that it's a matter of opinion. Quote:
Well, I really didn't intend to become so involved in this thread. This discussion seems to be turning into a "does not" "does to" sorta thing, and I don't think we are ever going to agree. My original intent in posting on this thread was not to change any minds, but to make the Christian view of HP opposition more clear for y'all, to the best of my ability. I really don't think that there is much else to say. I'll be seing y'all around the forums, but it's time for me to leave this thread alone. Mushie |
||||
02-21-2004, 07:45 PM | #44 |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Yeah, what HerenIstarion and Lush said.
(How's that for intellectual argument. ) Just to sum up. If a Christian God exists in HP's world, then HP's magical powers are derived from him and it cannot therefore be sinful to use them in the pursuit of good (just as in Middle-earth). If, on the other hand, a Christian God does not exist in HP's world then neither does Satan and therefore HP's powers cannot be satanic. And so we come to the question of whether HP can be condemned on the basis that it might seduce children into satanic practices. I am convinced that it holds no such danger, for the reasons that HerenIstanion has given. Admittedly, it might engender an interest in mysticism and occultism. But these in themselves are not evil, nor will they cause someone who takes an interest in them to become evil. Someone who is predisposed towards wrongful behaviour might try to use them for malicious ends. But then they would have pursued such ends whether they had an interest in the occult or not. This comes back to my point that it is not the knowledge in itself that is good or evil, but the end to which you put it. In my youth, having read LotR, I subsequently became interested in the RPG Dungeons & Dragons (itself condemned in some quarters as satanic). And thereafter, I became interested in the occult. But I never became a satanist. And I like to think that I have a pretty christian (small 'c') outlook on life. Maybe I would have developed those interests without having read LotR, but it definately sparked these things off for me. Which is why I believe that you cannot condemn HP without also condemning LotR, and indeed any form of art which involves magic (in the loose sense of the word) and mythical creatures. And I firmly believe that there is no call to condemn any of these things. A few additional comments: I looked up a few words in my Concise Oxford English Dictionary: witchcraft n. the use of magic; sorcery. sorceror n. (fem sorceress) a person who claims to use magic powers; a magician or wizard. sorcerous adj. sorcery n. wizard n. 1 a sorceror; a magician. 2 a person of remarkable powers, a genius. 3 a conjurer. magician n. 1 a person skilled in or practising magic. 2 a conjuror. 3 a person with exceptional skill. magic n. 1 the supposed art of influencing the course of events by the occult control of nature or the spirits. 2 conjuring tricks. 3 an inexplicable or remarkable influence producing surprising results. 4 an enchanting quality or phenomenon. No mention of evil. The definition depends upon the standpoint of the source. And Theron, you are right that things are relatively "black and white" in Tolkien's works. Those that act evilly are acting under Morgoth's influence. And, in doing so, they may derive their immediate power from Morgoth, but his power was originally derived from Eru. So all power in Middle-earth is ultimately sourced from Eru. As I have said, it is, in my view, the use to which that power is put that defines whether a character is good or evil (at any given time), not the power itself.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
02-22-2004, 06:42 AM | #45 | |
Deadnight Chanter
|
Quote:
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! Last edited by HerenIstarion; 06-15-2005 at 04:09 AM. Reason: quote code mess up |
|
02-22-2004, 11:43 AM | #46 |
Princess of Skwerlz
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: where the Sea is eastwards (WtR: 6060 miles)
Posts: 7,500
|
Reminder
I'd like to remind all participants in this discussion that posts on this board are expected to be related to Tolkien and his works. While the topic may be comparative, it should not go off on an unrelated tangent for any length of time.
__________________
'Mercy!' cried Gandalf. 'If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you. What more do you want to know?' 'The whole history of Middle-earth...' |
02-23-2004, 05:14 PM | #47 | |
Wight
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blowing the froth off a couple in this quaint little pub in Michel Delving.
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
0) Eru - original source of all authority and ability. 1) Morgoth or anyone else (Valar, Maiar, Elves, Men, etc.) receiving a gift of authority or ability from Eru, the prime creator, has the free will to do evil with it, corrupting themselves to some degree, depending on how much evil and how long, etc. 2) Anyone taking their cues and instructions (pattern of operation) from either source 0 or 1 takes also the good or evil thereof. -- (A) So, someone originally good, taking power and ability from Eru, or indirectly from someone else good, starts out good. But can choose to do evil with the authority and ability. -- (B) However, someone taking their pattern and method of operation from Morgoth or someone already declared/defined as evil, chooses the evil power, the evil pattern, the evil goals. Starts off more openly evil, less 'redemptive' options possibly. For example, even Sauron was given a chance to repent. He posed as though he had, but was a hypocrite, and remained confirmed in his evil. Likewise, Saruman. The fact that a good person can do or choose evil, yet have options for redemption, seems clear in your description of Galadriel (of which I was unaware, BTW, not having read the Sil yet) and in Tolkien's treatment of Gollum while with Frodo and Sam. So to go back to my main point. Yes, all power originally comes from Eru. That is without question. But Eru neither created evil, or made any evil power. Yet evil and evil power are manifest in the stories. The evil nature of certain beings' power or use of it, is in their rebellion against Eru and his will. P.S. I have been in the corporate environment too long. I think in bullet points...
__________________
For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. -Gandalf, The Two Towers |
|
02-23-2004, 05:26 PM | #48 | |
Wight
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blowing the froth off a couple in this quaint little pub in Michel Delving.
Posts: 147
|
Re: Reminder
Quote:
However, the topic being what it is AND comparative, too, I don't see how it has gotten off much. Nearly every post includes something about LotR or Tolkien. Even the few posts that deal primarily with some issue of HP and people's beliefs are, in general, responding to a post that related the two.
__________________
For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. -Gandalf, The Two Towers |
|
02-23-2004, 07:45 PM | #49 |
Dread Horseman
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,743
|
It is a tough job, and Esty does it very well.
Experience has shown that Tokien, Harry Potter, and religion can make a combustible mixture. Too frequently, we've seen HP/Tolkien/witchcraft threads take bad turns into heated religious arguments. Esty's post is just a reminder to keep this discussion focused on Tolkien. |
02-24-2004, 04:00 PM | #50 |
Fair and Cold
|
*tiptoeing quietly around the 'Hillo*
Theron, naturally, I agree with everything you've just said in your latest post. I think our only quibble might be whether what occurs in Harry Potter is any different from what occurs in Lord of the Rings. The Mushroom seems to think so; I do and I don't. I think the real difference lies in rhetoric: particularly in the word "witchcraft." It's present throughout the HP books and manifests itself in characters that are both good and evil. It's also present in LotR, but with negative connotations. This might lead anyone to think that HP advertises the occult, whereas LotR explicitly condemns it. I do not favour that view, because I think it hinges greatly on the use of a specific word, and less so on logic. Stick the character of Galadriel into the world of HP, and what do you think her title would be? "Sorceress," at least. I say this because I ultimately do not view the LotR as a book that has explicitly Christian themes; Tolkien intended to write it as a myth, and magic is one of the aspects myth will inevitably deal with. Naturally his creation is unique and its implications are unique as well, coloured by the author's own background, no less. Yet if we were to read books strictly as the author intended them to be read, we would have no need for literature in general. Shakespeare, for example, would not have needed to bother with his comedies and tragedies and sonnets and etc. He should have just written a laundry-list of truisms on life as he saw it and left it at that. Furthermore, I doubt that Tolkien neccessarily wished a specific Christian agenda to be attached to the books in the minds of his readers. Ultimately, I think that people that oppose HP for religious reasons whilst condoning the LotR are failing to see beyond the rhetoric.
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ |
02-24-2004, 06:17 PM | #51 | |||||
Wight
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blowing the froth off a couple in this quaint little pub in Michel Delving.
Posts: 147
|
"dook"? Is that dook-ey? :D
Quote:
Tolkien confronts the issue by defusing it--changing it into a different issue, by using an old English term "wizard" relating to wise with age, experience, wisdom. Quote:
Quote:
Rowling wanted to write a book about a witchcraft world--wizards and witches among us. She could have written it as a Science Fiction style, some other planet with nearly parallel "evolution" producing a race of wizards. She chose to put it in the "known" modern present world, possibly a relatively confrontational choice. But then to sidestep the religious prohibition/taboo on witchcraft, she invokes the "witchcraft gene" hole card. Quote:
Quote:
I think Tolkien would have been pleased and humbled that a reader could have taken from the book a strong appreciation for many clear Christian virtues, though his purpose was to write a great story, that pleased his interests. P.S. Lest you get the wrong idea, I love the HP books, and encourage my children to read them.
__________________
For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. -Gandalf, The Two Towers |
|||||
02-24-2004, 06:34 PM | #52 | |||
Fair and Cold
|
dook as in we just had some terps for dinner
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ |
|||
02-24-2004, 11:34 PM | #53 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
The majority of Christians accept LOTR and the Chronicles. I find that most who don't haven't actually read them. (How could they? After all, they'd go to hell in a hand-basket if they did, according to their own beliefs.)
Let's see...magic in LOTR is a gift of power from Eru, or Iluvatar, commonly associated with God. Choices are made and the gift is used - it is neither good nor evil in itself. Magic in Narnia - we have Uncle Andrew (Magician's Nephew), who dabbled in the occult, the White Witch or Empress Jadis (MN, TLTWATW), and we have the Green Witch Serpent (Silver Chair). All are portrayed as the antagonists. Uncle Andrew is a proud fool who dabbled in the occult. Jadis was the last ruler of Charn, and the source of her power is dubious, though I believe it came from her searching for power to destroy. The Green Lady's power is...well, never mind. HP, however, has everyday magic. IMHO its more scientific magic than anything else - spells for convienience. I don't believe God is completely out of the HP picture, but he certainly isn't 'visible' in the books. The gift is given to certain people. Their choices are their own; the practice of HP witchcraft is not the practice of 'demonic' witchcraft. God forbids witchcraft; but real-life witchcraft has nothing to do with HP witchcraft. Am I making any sense? Feel free to PM me if you have any questions for me...or if they relate to the thread post them here... Cheers, ~ Elentari II
__________________
Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit ------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~------------ A laita Atar, ar Yondo, ar Ainasule. Ve nes i yessesse na sin, ar yeva tennoio. Nasie. |
02-25-2004, 12:20 AM | #54 | |
Deadnight Chanter
|
Quote:
As for HP, same principle may apply (if we draw the logical chain, it will lead us to conclusion that HP witchcraft is not magic either, for powers implied are also natural - so people are born to be wizards). Therefore I, to my own slight surprise, come to conclusion that there is no magic (if it is what we define as supernatural powers) whatsoever in both books. Another conclusion follows that the whole fuss around HP comes from the usage of terms by the author. If she bothered to replace the 'bad' words with some scientific crap (as for telepathy, mental power tra la la tra la la), there would be nothing to clash our lances for.
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
|
02-25-2004, 10:25 AM | #55 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Supernatural Elves?
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
02-25-2004, 10:28 AM | #56 | ||
Dread Horseman
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,743
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-25-2004, 10:33 AM | #57 |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Elf-Witch?
Although, to be fair, Eomer didn't exactly paint a positive picture of Galadriel. His association of her with sorcerers appears to have been done with negative intent.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
02-25-2004, 10:41 AM | #58 |
Dread Horseman
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,743
|
Yeah, I think that's sort of the point. Don't the 'muggles' in HP judge the 'wizard' characters as, if not outright evil, then at least dangerous and unnatural? Éomer's comments are based on fear and ignorance, and are far from the truth, as Gimli attests.
|
02-25-2004, 10:51 AM | #59 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
True, but HP and his chums would happily describe each other as witches and sorcerors, whereas I don't see Galadriel referring to herself in these terms.
The words are used positively in the HP books, whereas they have more negative connotations in Tolkien's works. Which is why I think Lush is spot on when she says: Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
02-25-2004, 12:02 PM | #60 |
Blithe Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,779
|
To those who would distinguish LotR from HP on the grounds that in Tolkien everything emenates from Eru - you only find that out if you've read the Sil. There is no mention of Eru or indeed of any religious practice or belief in LotR, except perhaps for Faramir and his men turning west before they eat.
I first read LotR before the Sil was ever published, and when it (the Sil) finally came out, I was quite surprised when I read the Ainulindale. "Oh, there is a kind of religion in Tolkien after all," I thought. I was a child at the time so I was perhaps not so aware of underlying symbolism and so on, but I still think that most adults today who have only read LotR would not necessarily be struck by its Christian meaning. My own belief is that those who want/need religion in Tolkien will find it and those who insist on seeing evil in Harry Potter will find that too. I am also not aware of this issue of banning Tolkien, Rowling or whatever being debated anywhere outside the US, but I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong. (Oh and as for witchcraft in the Bible - Saul consulted the Witch of Endor in order to communicate with the dead Samuel. Necromancy, no less!) |
02-25-2004, 03:03 PM | #61 | |
Wight
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blowing the froth off a couple in this quaint little pub in Michel Delving.
Posts: 147
|
Valar Supernatural, but Elves?
Quote:
Now the Elves are a different matter. I think I read in the Letters, but maybe here on the forum that Elves and Men are like different aspects of human nature in Tolkien's design. I don't really understand it that way, but do not really know how to define elves, or their "power". Galadriel gets some power from her ring. I don't really know the nature of the ring. What power would she have as a ringless elf? The "good" men do not refer to elves as evil or sorceresses, etc. except out of fear and ignorance. However, there is clearly much about Elves that is "super" man-natural, or above the inherent nature of man. Anyway, I am pretty sure there is more than a "rhetorical" difference between the magics (HP vs LotR).
__________________
For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. -Gandalf, The Two Towers |
|
02-25-2004, 03:29 PM | #62 | |||
Wight
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blowing the froth off a couple in this quaint little pub in Michel Delving.
Posts: 147
|
Church Lady & Witchcraft
Quote:
However, I have a humorous story to relate. My children began reading the stories before I ever got around to checking them out. I had a vague uneasiness, because of the witchcraft issue and the books' popularity. I just made sure my children understood this to be make-believe. My mother-in-law, without having read the books, said, "You're not letting them read THAT?!" My wife said, "Mama, why don't you read one? You're a former school teacher and a Sunday School (Christian training) teacher. You should be able to evaluate it yourself. Then let's talk about it." She did and found them thoroughly entertaining and "non-corrupting." Well, there was some big hoohah about one of the recent books published or the HP movies or something. And all the little old ladies in the Sunday School class, were up in arms about how people could let their children read/see/whatever. My mother-in-law said, "Well, have you ever read them?" "NO!" "Well, I have. And I see better character and values in there than I see in lots of church people!" That pretty much shut them up. Quote:
Quote:
However, by choosing to set the stories within present day society (wizards among us), she may have chosen purposefully to rile up these reactions among people. Anyway, Bekah, what do you mean by "real-life witchcraft?"
__________________
For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. -Gandalf, The Two Towers |
|||
02-25-2004, 04:35 PM | #63 | ||||||
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think I should stop thinking about this for now. I'm starting to get a headache.... Cheers, ~ Elentari II
__________________
Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit ------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~------------ A laita Atar, ar Yondo, ar Ainasule. Ve nes i yessesse na sin, ar yeva tennoio. Nasie. |
||||||
02-26-2004, 12:23 AM | #64 |
Deadnight Chanter
|
Saucepen Man supernatural elves re (leaving whole witchcraft issue alone for a while):
From mortal point of view, yes, maybe they must have been thought of as supernatural (even at that time) On the other hand, no, neither elves nor even Valar seem supernatural at all. By nature I mean not a nearby wood and a river , the Nature in question is the whole of the universe, created in the Halls of Eru. It is arguable that Ainur were before time and creation of the world, and therefore must be supernatural, but I was talking about Valar, who entered the World because they loved it and are henceforward bound by it. Ainur who did not do not meddle with the world afterwards. So, the argument is - whatever is inside nature, is natural, regardless its abilities of walking thrugh walls or high speed travel or enchantment There is a whole of Osanwe-Kenta to consult with (as to restrictions following such an entrance and imposed by 'being bound with the history of the world', i.e. impossibility to interact with the substance of the world if not at least 'clothed' in a body etc.) Check out Jallanite's entry here It deals mainly with the possibility of flight for the incarnate Maiar, but can give an insight as for 'supernaturalness' as well. Therefore, I conclude, that there is no magic (if defined as something supernatural) in ME, but mere application of natural faculties
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
02-26-2004, 05:38 AM | #65 | ||
Blithe Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,779
|
Quote:
http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthr...ight=parochial Quote:
|
||
02-26-2004, 07:19 AM | #66 | |
Deadnight Chanter
|
Quote:
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! Last edited by HerenIstarion; 02-26-2004 at 08:01 AM. |
|
02-26-2004, 07:37 AM | #67 |
Blithe Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,779
|
Fair enough.
I'm just going by the fact that in western Europe most media reports on controversy seem to come from the States. And I suspect that the Russian/Georgian fuss might have been sparked by the initial furore in the US. But I don't think it would have occurred to either Tolkien or Rowling that magic/fantasy content in their books would upset or offend Christians. It just isn't an issue in the environment they were both writing in. |
02-26-2004, 07:59 AM | #68 | |||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Nevertheless, I agree, HI, that, if you define nature in the wider sense of the natural world of Arda, then nothing which exists within Arda can be considered supernatural. Then again, as you said earlier, the same argument can apply to the world of HP.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|||
02-26-2004, 02:15 PM | #69 | |
Fair and Cold
|
Quote:
Please don't think this issue is limited to Harry Potter either. Tolkien's works are viewed as equally corrupting by religious zealots. I ought to know, I'm part of that institution (as in, I'm a practicing Russian Orthodox). I suspect the Russian religious furor over Harry Potter and Tolkien has a lot to do with the church being able to let off steam after decades of being suppressed. It's like the initial fizz that comes out of a coke bottle that's been shaken one time too many. P.S. As a disclaimer, though, on the other hands we have a large number of young Russian Orthodox priests smoking Marlboros in public, wearing jeans under their robes, reading everything from Tolkien to "Emmanuelle" (to educate themselves on popular culture, naturally). Russia is just...confused right now, in that whole lovable, post-USSR, utter economic meltdown sort of way. P.P.S. Oh, and Heren, I'm totally right about magic in LotR, and you're totally wrong! Hehe. I think at this point we can agree to disagree.
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ Last edited by Lush; 02-26-2004 at 02:19 PM. |
|
02-27-2004, 12:06 AM | #70 | |
Deadnight Chanter
|
magic re: âñå ìîæåò áûòü...
well. dunno about being totally something, yet with all due respect I will retain my view in the case, m'lady... *H-I bows Quote:
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
|
03-02-2004, 02:43 PM | #71 |
Fair and Cold
|
A thought struck me today (better a thought that a truck, right?);
What if, the seeming discrepancy between the way that LotR and Harry Potter are perceived by "concerned" parents might have something to do with the advent of the information age and the way people have reacted to it? Think about it. Back when Tolkien was first beginning to be published, the illusion of living in a vacuum still pervailed for many conservatives. The positive aspect of that, in my opinion, was that this made parents feel somehow more "responsible" for the way their young children behaved. The media was gaining power, but it did not yet seem omnipresent. When Tolkien arrived on the scene, sure, religious concerns were raised and addressed. Protesting a work of art is not a 20th century invention; yet the past centuries organized religion's primary concern was science. The outlets used to popularize art were not nearly as powerful as they have recently become. In the context of the family, therefore, art did not seem to be an immediate threat to children. Furthermore, parents felt that they had more of a say in terms what their children read and how the reading affected them. Flash forward to today. Mass-media appears to be taking over human conscience; the exchange of information is easy; news are merging with advertising and suddenly media executives have become "experts" on how to live. How many local news reports do you watch a week that purport to intimidate you into leading your life a certain way? How many journalists/pundits/talk-show hosts appear to reach out to you and tell you that it is up to them to solve your problems? In this climate, with Harry Potter arriving fresh on the scene and immediately becoming as familiar as Cindy Crawford's mole through the power of hype, parents feel marginalized. It's as if raising their children is no longer up to them anymore; it's up to Disney, it's up to MTV, it's up to...Rowling. If an average conservative Christian father, for example, suddenly discovers his daughter to be dabbling in the occult, his immediate response may not be: "what have I done wrong in explaining to her that our religion does not approve of this?" Rather, it may go along these lines: "What has the media done wrong?" "What has Harry Potter done wrong?" "What has the chain bookstore done wrong?" Tolkien, having already become an intrinsic part of pop culture, is safer by comparison. His books have been around. They seem to have been time-tested. They're alright. Right? (Though it would be curious to see just what the recent films have been doing to that image)
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ |
03-04-2004, 12:22 AM | #72 |
Deadnight Chanter
|
fine by me
Though the wish to blame others for any blunders, even one's own, is what humans generally do. It's always good day for someone else to die, hum. ...my cow is dead not cause I'd forgotten to feed it, but cause that warty-nosy woman next door bewitched it... But you are probably right. May be that, once written century ago, HP might have taken place on the shelves beside Alice.
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
03-08-2004, 05:11 PM | #73 | |
Wight
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blowing the froth off a couple in this quaint little pub in Michel Delving.
Posts: 147
|
about the book banning...
I read the linked forum threads and articles till my eyes glazed over... I read the entire original wacko article on the website that referred to HP and LOTR as evil.
1. The guy just stated his opinion condemning everyone who basically does not think exactly as he does. I did not see any reasonable or logical argument from the Bible or anything. Just a bunch of propaganda techniques. So I can just dismiss that as that idiot's opinion. So my more or less innocent question still stands. I mean a Bible or otherwise kind of justification for opposing LotR. Because beliefs are just that, beliefs. Like the T-shirt I had in college: Quote:
3. On the thread about LOTR being banned from a school, it turned out on the second page of the thread (hard to remember, both eyes and half my brain was glazed over by that time) that it was a false alarm, and it was really HP that was targeted. People were still ranting about it. 4. In a private school, at least (presumably it was some religious one), the principal may indeed have the right and/or authority (depending on the charter) to 'ban' materials such as books based on content. I won't get into any details, but all the B-D'ers who were, again, yelling "What gives them the right?" were just down right wrong! I even noted one person said, Hey, this is the USA, you can do anything you want! (not an exact quote, but that was the gist of it.) To which I say, what? Are you reading that in the US Constitution? Or is that some flyer from the People's Republic of California? Ha ha, maybe it is the Zeroth (0th) Amendment: We the people can do anything we want--after all, this is America.
__________________
For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. -Gandalf, The Two Towers |
|
03-09-2004, 12:16 AM | #74 |
Deadnight Chanter
|
Theron Bugtussle, and the morale is...?
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
03-10-2004, 06:27 PM | #75 |
Wight
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blowing the froth off a couple in this quaint little pub in Michel Delving.
Posts: 147
|
...long explanations...
Heren, my original post was as follows:
Quote from Bekah: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (How could they [read them]? After all, they'd go to hell in a hand-basket if they did, according to their own beliefs.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quoting my own reply: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Explain what belief or belief system you are talking about. I know certain people freak out like something is going to jump on them from out of the pages, but it is not according to teaching, Biblical or otherwise that I am aware of. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then Bekah responded of a sect/church that has some beliefs against worldliness. I was hoping for an explanation of those beliefs, some teaching or instruction as to how they developed the justification for a "ban" on The Lord of the Rings. There was no explanation of it there, though. Then Lalaith and The Saucepan Man responded with links to threads where the book was banned. One of the threads included a link to a religious "ranter" against LotR, but my point is (point #1), there was no substance there, no logical case, no Bible instruction as to how he arrived at his opinion. So I am still looking for the belief system. My point #2 was, that in those threads, the B-D'ers that disagree with the "ranter" are just as wrong when they say he has no "right" to condemn it or them, or whatever. He has the right to disagree with you, or me. I personally believe he is wrong, but he has the right to be "wrong" in my eyes. I think this is how "political correctness" starts or perpetuates. People say, "You have no right!" when they should be saying, "I disagree with you. And I will debate you about it." My point #3 was, the B-D'ers were going off "half-cocked" about a "ban" on The Lord of the Rings that never really happened. Then when the mistake was indicated on the thread, some B-D'ers continued to rant and rave about how it was wrong... Anyone feel embarrassed yet? My point #4 was that in many school circumstances, particularly private (non-taxpayer) or religious schools, the authorities have every right to set the academic tone, rules, content, etc. So all B-D'ers disagreeing (again about the issue of rights) were wrong. I realize that many members here are relatively young. So maybe you/they do not always clearly understand what a 'right' is and that people can disagree. Next time, it might help if you read my reply a little closer. I usually try to make a meaningful explanation of my arguments. If that fails, read my sig!
__________________
For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. -Gandalf, The Two Towers |
03-10-2004, 11:39 PM | #76 |
Fair and Cold
|
So one of the most beautiful aspects of life in America is that everyone can enjoy their constitutionally protected right to spout the most profoundly stupid stuff you might hear on this side of Western Civilization.
Ah, liberty. My high school should have banned LotR, considering that I devoted entire class periods to reading Tolkien, only occasionally looking up with a glazed look in my eyes and mumbling nonesense about Aragorn when the answer was "Andropov."
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ |
03-11-2004, 01:00 AM | #77 |
Deadnight Chanter
|
Doth quoteth Duchess - there always is a morale
Theron, how dare you? You have no right to give me long explanations!
*reads the sig ah, so you were talking to yourself, than? You have no right to talk to yourself on the public fora!!! *reflects a bit more And nobody has the right to ban my wish to have a morale than and there!!!!! _________________ Well (good way to start apologetical sentences, the 'well' thingy). I hope you were not hurt by the bit of foolery immediately above. And, of course, pray accept my apologies on being inattentive to your previous posts. I was drifting in another direction with theological issues, (after all, that is what started the whole thread, 'banning/right to do so' being a side walk as a consequence of books being thought satanical) so concluded you were referring to those, not to human rights as it came out. I will be more attentive next time cheers (and no worries, eh?)
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
03-11-2004, 07:40 AM | #78 | ||||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Rights and wrongs
Mr Bugtussle
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! Last edited by The Saucepan Man; 03-11-2004 at 07:56 AM. |
||||
03-12-2004, 01:24 AM | #79 |
Deadnight Chanter
|
The thread seemingly have had developed two parallel courses.
A) Human rights B) Whether books fall under descrpition of 'satanic' (as described by Christian Faith, since the schools in question presumably profess such) I rather tend to assume the main thing here is the clause B, and once it is solved (and I believe it is solved up there), the whole issue is worked out as well. For once it is proved LoTR and HP are books definitely acceptable by those professing Christianity, the whole point of banning those is lost As for the A clause, I personally believe that schools have a right and are entitled to ban anything and everything from the classes, but individual has the right and is entitled to read whatever he/she pleases in the dormitory. My [free] time is my own to spend, whatever the bans. The major problem arises once school tries to ban one's free-time reading. Than indeed the battlecry of "excuse me pal, but you have no right to do so" should be uttered Still more, it is unwise to ban a book, lest authorities doing so are not secret admirers trying to advertise it, and cunningly disguising themselves as persecutors in secret hope that thus books they are banning would become a way more popular. You tell people not to do something, next minute everyone is trying it out (even those who would not if it were free to do)
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
03-12-2004, 07:08 AM | #80 |
Wight
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Troll's larder
Posts: 195
|
Well, I guess worse things have been done before...
Sometimes I wonder whether Prof T had any interest in the Unknown himself. He spun very wonderful tales about wizards and elves and magic, but the only definitions and explainations that he himself would provide for all these unnatural stuff are that they are all things that Mundane Men have not heard about and learnt of. That really sounded a lot like: "You won't understand if I tell you anyway, so why bother to ask?" All myths and fiction come from the thoughts of the human brain, and as such, should have basis in th actual living world, whether perceived or factual.
__________________
'He wouldn't make above a mouthful,' said William, who had already had a fine supper, 'not when he was skinned and boned.' |
|
|