![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
DGF-SL-01: Yes that would works, because it refers to the entire Third Age. I would probably have removed the reference to the white tree completely. But it is okay as it is, so it does not do the trick fully for me (see last point in this post).
LA-SL-16, LA-SL-17 & DGF-SL-03.5: Agreed. LA-SL-13 & DGF-SL-13: Yes, that works for me. DGF-SL-16: Okay. I am still not completely satisfied with the structure in this chapter. This might sound a bit radical, but what about this: Quote:
Beside that I added DGF-SL-04.5 and moved DGF-SL-07b to this now first occurrence of Meneldil. Since here he is already named a nephew of Isildur, I changed the note accordingly. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
So are you suggesting that the chapter be called The Tradition of Isildur with The Disaster of the Gladden Fields switching places to become the sub-heading? Or are you saying that they should be separate chapters? If you are saying that they should become separate chapters, then I do not agree. The resulting chapter: The Tradition of Isildur would be far too short, rivaling even our chapter Of the Five Wizards. I think that this makes it somewhat unlikely, and I see no real need to present it in this oddly truncated state. May I ask why you feel the need to rearrange so strongly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I suggested exactlly the spliting into 2 seperate entitties.
But I can understand your concerns. But in that case I would still say that 'The Tradition of Isildur' is the better title for a combined chapter. The impulse to combine the chapters was fact that at the beginning of 'The Tradition of Isildur' has a very similar passage to that from 'The Rings of Power' that we used directly before. The real important change that I wanted, is DGF-SL-04.5. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Very well, I will agree to switch the chapter name and the sub-heading, and keep your changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
After reading this chapter, I think the decision to change the father and son in the Lost Road section to Isildur and Elendur was the right decision. Getting to know them and their relationship in that chapter strengthens their interactions in this chapter and makes their deaths more tragic. Some comments:
1) Quote:
2) There seem to be a few typos in the text Arcus sent me, or the original text: Quote:
Quote:
3) This is more a question than a comment. At the end of note 20 it says "Nonetheless it proved in the event that the War of the Ring was lost at the Disaster of the Gladden Fields." I don't understand this. The War of the Ring was ultimately a victory. How was the War lost at the Disaster of the Gladden Fields? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
1) This need wallet is mentioned in the following text 'The Sources of the legend of Isildur's death' which I did not include in this chapter because it contains many references to Aragorn and the Fourth Age. However, looking at it again, I think we can include it, or at least part of it. Here is my proposed inclusion:
Quote:
3) I think this is most likely a slip on Tolkien's part, he clearly means the War of the Last Alliance. Last edited by ArcusCalion; 12-29-2018 at 09:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
1) I think this section makes sense at the end of the chapter. I see that you added the rest of "The Sources of the legend of Isildur's death" to another chapter, I was actually going to recommend doing just that and removing the chapter from Volume 3.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|