![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#3 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
About the Elessar: If this second tale about the Elessar is to be taken up at all, then the place for it is exactly where you point it to be. So even if I have some doubt about taking it up at all, I would like to see your editing it into the text and edits you made in the text. I think I have to re-read our discussion in the Earendil chapter, to remember what we said their about the two versions and specially about the ‘first’ Elessar and Enerdhil.
CGC-SL-15: Okay we will remove commenting the part of the text. But I think we agree to keep the footnote under CGC-SL-16 to CGC-SL-19. CGC-SL-18: I don’t feel that the addition of Anatar here as absolutely necessary, but I am okay with it. CGC-SL-21: My remark was based on gondowe’s posting in the thread about Galadriel and Celeborn: Quote:
Howsoever I think we agree that no such remark as gondowe wished to include is wanted in our version. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|