![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
If we are to add in the Dwarves and Men material (which I would argue we should not) I have composed a draft of how it might be done.
The first paragraph of Of the Kindreds and Houses of the Edain must be greatly altered, due to the fact that I missed the change in order of the arrival of the tribes in Beleriand, and also the note in Ros about their sojurn by the sea of Rhun. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by ArcusCalion; 09-04-2017 at 05:18 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Back to my own comment 1: I retake it. As it stands now it is fine to have the meeting of the people of Caranthir with the dwarves recorded here.
NE-CD-01: Agreed. {Thargelion}[Radhrost]: I think Radhrost is as well no longer valid. I would rather replace Thargelion by Talath Rhúnen as in our general changes. NE-CD-02 and NE-CD-03: Agreed. NE-CD-04: These dates are okay. And I think we should keep them. We just have to change Glomund to Glaurung. NE-CD-05: Agreed. {Maidors}[Maedhros]: Up to now the discussion was between Maedros or Maedron and the decision was made to take the more conservative Maedros. So please remove the ‘h’. NE-CM-01: Agreed. NE-KE-01: Agreed. NE-KE-00.2: Agreed and this change is necessary either way, taking material form Of Dwarves and Men or not. NE-KE-00.5: The general discussion of material from Of Dwarves and Men we should keep in one place, and that is for me the thread about Concerning Naugrim, Ents and Eagles. If we agree there to take these material up, I agree to this use. NE-KE-01.2: Agreed. NE-KE-00.3: Agreed. But see NE-KE-00.5. NE-KE-03: Agreed. But see NE-KE-00.5. And I would include all the stuff about the Drûg, making your last section look like this: Quote:
NE-KE-04: This is the start of the Drúedain stuff. It might be used to head the general discussion if this material should be placed here. I did not mark the removal of editorial footnotes with editing markers. I hope that is okay. NE-KE-05: Here we have a special case. The material about the selfnaming should be included, but it can be discussed if a footnote is the right wax, when this arrangement was clearly editorial. NE-KE-06: Thedeleted stuff should be used in the Second Age story. NE-KE-07 and NE-KE-08: This alone would, in my opinion, be worth the inclusion of the Drûg in this chapter. NE-KE-09: JRR Tolkien marked these for deletion. But I hesitate about it. Even so I see Tolkiens reason, this would fit the Drûg very well and provides a look into the attitude to fungus of the other Edain and Eldar. NE-KE-10: Okay this is an editorial footnote, but it contains some Authorial statement. Therefore I put a marker on it. Nonetheless I think it must go. NE-KE-11: This § seems not useable as it is too much showing the essay stile. NE-KE-12: I put that marker to discuss the Hobbit stuff that follows in OF Dwarves and Men. For me that would belong into the Third Age narrative. But it can be discussed if (farther) parts of it should be included here. Respectfully Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I will make a more detailed reply to your comments as soon as I am able, but at the moment I would like to say that I think now that as long as no pieces of the essay are "lost" but are simply used in different parts of the work, then I suppose it does make sense to chop it up. There was a footnote you deleted about Merry and Elfhelm, and these are the kinds of deletions that I was worried about when you wanted to chop up the essay, so if that is included here again, or reused somewhere else (although I do not see how or where) then I will be ok with the addition of these sections, as well as the sections in the Dwarves chapter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
What I deleted from the footnote was the editorial part added by Christopher Tolkien. It is true that in this part Elfhelm and Merry are reffered to, but these editorial refferences have to go anyhow. So I think it should be okay.
Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
As explained in Of the Sindar I would move §6 to that chapter and skip it here.
Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I think we should keep the note about the fungus because it is such an interesting source of information about so many things.
On a side note, some of the other notes about the druedain in the UT chapter, are they being saved for the second and third age stuff? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
What is from JRR Tolkien himself in these notes is from later paragraphs of the essay. And yes, what is useable should be used there.
Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |