![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
A second go on Comments:
CE-EX-24: This headline for the sub-chapter has no source in Tolkien. If someone has more authoritative idea I would gladly take it. CE-EX-25: At this point the source info was wrong. Actually we change back to our basis text LQ. CE-SL-10: Ælfwine is out of our version and this does together with our inserts provoke the grammatical change from {they}the Elves. CE-SL-11: Oromë’s help in making language is mention some were else already and the rest is deleted due to Tolkiens own change. CE-EX-26: The pure joy of the Valar at the coming of the Elves is only hinted at in the later legendarium. I see nothing that speaks against the more direct version of LT. CE-EX-27: In the later legendarium Oromë seems no longer in need of his mother to tell him about the children of Eru. CE-EX-28: Angainor is still valid as the inserts from MT show. So I think we should also take up it making. At least we should take the next paragraph with the counsel taken. CE-EX-29: The change from the direct story telling of LT to the remote comments of the essays from MT adds a nice contrast. ![]() CE-SL-12: In the later legendarium the Valar have to deal with Utumno and Angband. CE-EX-30: The armour taking of the Valar might be to pictorial, but I find it still fitting. CE-EX-31, -32: Okay, Makar and Messa have no place in our version. CE-EX-33: In the later legendarium some tasks that were Nonores were taken up by Eönwë and of course all the parts of Fionwe. Thus we might choose if Eönwë should be behind Manwë on the chariot or go before. CE-EX-34: Nahar, Orome’s horse is white not brown. CE-EX-35: If one of the Valar of the later legendarium would be probable to have a son then it is Tulkas, but still I think it is much safer to leave Telimektar out of our version. CE-SL-36: Ops! A pure numbering error it should be CE-SL-13. To the point itself, as we learn from MT even in this battle Melkor was not willing to fight it out personally. CE-EX-36: Here follow a long insert from AAm which provides the best description of the war. CE-EX-37: This is an insert in the insert. And it takes the breaking of the gates from LT. No later account is found how the Valar broke that gate, so why not by the magic of Oromë’s horn? CE-EX-38: These changes are based on Tolkiens plan to reduce the number of the Balrogs and by that make them more formidable. As we have based our work in FoG on the assumption 3 or maximum 7 we are obliged to take this changes as well. CE-EX-39: Here it is high time for this addition, as it explains nicely what the Valar had archived in the war up to this point. CE-EX-40, -14: As explained in my last post, Morgoth has to go. But the theory here bound to that name is valid and for sure worth recording. CE-EX-42: This is the only descriptive look into the pits of Utumno we will ever get. It would be a shame to lose it. CE-EX-43: This is dangerous territory. Has Melkor given to the Orcs and Balrogs the power of recuperation and multiplication? Not if the Orcs were at least in part Elves, Men, Maiar or even pre-existing beasts and for the Balrogs not if they are Maiar. Therefore I think it much more safe to eliminate the examples. CE-EX-44: Again a description from LT that never changed: The gates of Utumno were blocked but the caverns were still full of evil creatures that a times would find a way out. CE-EX-45: We later seldom get a chance to ears drop on the Valar in council. CE-EX-46: Again Makar the War-God of Tolkien that later was removed. CE-SL-14: Melkor is no longer bound. He has to hold his peace by himself or his plans, recorded in the MT-passages would come to light. CE-SL-15: Again: Melkor is unchained. CE-EX-47: Here at long last we come back to our basis text. And we have to discuss if Melkor was bound with Angainor while he was prisoner in Mandos or not. My feeling is that this was not the case. The reclusion was probably not even meant as a punishment but a help in repentance and selfabasement in order to reassemble his ‘disperesed’ inherent power. CE-SL-16 and -18: This rearrangement is due to my additions. Probably we can delete what follows as redundant, but found it more profitable to keep at least the three ages of peace. CE-SL-17: Again we are talking of Utumno and Angband and not one of them alone. CE-EX-48: Here we have the next chance to listen directly to the Valar in council. CE-EX-49: Nearly a regular change from the later abounded children of the Valar to their folk. CE-EX-50: Ulmo is the one Valar that we knew to oppose the bringing of the Elves to Valinor. Therefore I shifted this argument of Makar to him even so that might be discussed. CE-EX-51: Again, we know that Ulmo was in opposition to this. CE-EX-52: Being back in our basic text we add here the info who brought the message to Cuivienen. CE-EX-53: The second council again reported most excellently in LT. Here might be mentioned that the motive for Ulmo’s smile is changed significantly. When it was written he hope for the Elves to come soon, now he has found some hope that they might refuse the summon. CE-SL-20: The old timeline had Melkor in prison for a long time when the Elves arrived. This was clearly changed. CE-EX-54 to -58: AAm and LT have here the fuller accounts and are therefore the texts I have chosen. With CE-EX-59 begin the additions from Q&E, but since it is getting late already and I think I missed at least one of these, I will stop here and come back to it later this week. About Ainairos: Up to now I have not included him or his role as leader of the Teleri party speaking against the Noldor after the kin-slying into my draft. But now he will be one of the points checked before I post these part of my draft. Respectfully Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 09-22-2015 at 07:27 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Before I go on with my comments on the changes I would like to introduce some more material:
Quote:
Quote:
Here only the comments on the first part I added: CE-EX-09 and -12: I changed the source inforamtion to make clearer where to find this text. CE-EX-13.2: This is Appendix C of Q&E. It is very linguistic stuff, but with some info include that seems to me worth consideration. CE-EX-13.3: I moved this paragraph up to hold the info about manish tongues together. CE-EX-13.4: This should be used later. Probably in the chapter 13 Of the Sindar. CE-EX-13.5: I moved this Note from the Essay into a footnote in our text. Respectfully Findegil |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
On we go with my comments:
CE-EX-58.3: Here I added the linguistic Information about the Name Avari. CE-EX-58.4: Since we moved the texts we have to Change the reference. CE-EX-58.5: Again here, but 'it will been said' seems not okay for me. CE-EX-59: As this contains a lot of Information about the debate among the Quendi I find it improtant to include it. CE-EX-60: This should probably have been a -SL- number, but the fact is the sun is not around in our version of this time. CE-EX-60.3: The Calben/Morben info fits (if at all) in this place. CE-EX-60.4: The reference is to paragraph we did not take up fully, so it has to go. CE-EX-60.5: Both Information (about Eöl and Saeros insult) must be considered for inserting in the proper place in the narative. CE-EX-61: The Long Addition from Q&E does bring in the Information about relative numbers of the sundering of the Elves. CE-EX-62, -64 and -65: Here are inserted the lingustical information about the respective clan names. CE-EX-63: A Change in the Basic text made by JRR Tolkien. CE-EX-66, -67 and -68: The use and Definition of 'Umanyar' is much broder given in Q&E. CE-EX-69: The journey of the Eldar is best described in AAm. CE-SL-21: Do we hold that chronology? I found it safer to remove the years. CE-EX-70: Namo is no longer valid as shown in Q&E below. CE-EX-71: Linguistics about the Nandor, denying the validity of Namo. CE-EX-72: Do we Change the chronology? If yes, These might stand. Safest way would probably be to remove both 'not' and 'long'. CE-EX-73: Again we take up AAm because it gives the fuller account. CE-SL-22: Again a question if we want to fix the chronolgy or not. CE-EX-74: I couldn't resist this nice and melacholic part from LT maken clear how horiable that journey must have been. CE-EX-75 and -76: Linguistics about the Sindar. CE-EX-77: Since Dân no longer seems to be the right name, his people should be named after him. A view Point in addition: - I have marked that I missed some of Tolkiens notes especialy in thses last paragraphs. I will later work on that point. - I am currently think about an addition here from Q&E about the Falathrim and probably including the Essay Círdan. Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Okay, I did the work with the Notes directly, so why not share it:
Quote:
Quote:
Findegil |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Okay, I discovered a mistake of mine: Starting with CE-EX-73 I expanded a part of the LQ that was deliberately a summary of events told later in a much fuller account. The summary is given at this place to complete lingustical account (that is original in LQ) of the names of the Elvish groups. The next chapter 6 Of Eldamar and the Princes of the Eldalië begins with the Vanyar and Noldor reaching the shore of Beleriand. Therefore here is only the palce for linguistic information to be added and not for expansion the story telling. I worked through the text again keeping that in mind and give it here starting with last paragraph before the changes begin. This paragraph is from an addition coming from Q&E:
Quote:
CE-EX-73 (with CE-SL-22) This Story is told in the next chapter. If the AAm has to be inserted there must be discussed when we edit that chapter. CE-EX-74 Same is true for this material from [/b]LT[/b]. Accordingly §30 of the original LQ is restored. CE-EX-75 and -76: These are unchanged from the last version. CE-EX-76.1: This is a long addition from Q&E. It includes some farther information about the Sindar an general but also adds names in Sindarin for the Noldor and the devision of the Sindar themselves. CE-EX-76.2: The reference was from one part of Q&E to an other, but due to my editing they are now very close together. CE-EX-76.3: I removed this spoiler. The enmity between Thingol and the Feanorians should not be fortold. CE-EX-76.4: Here I removed the structure of the Q&E text. The last 3 paragraphs about the Círdan’s folk I would rather use in chapter 6 Of Eldamar and the Princes of the Eldalië were also the essay Círdan is used. Respectfully Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||||||||||||
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
![]()
Hi all! I have finished reviewing Findegil's changes for this section, and I will here place my thoughts. This will be quite a long post, so I apologize. Before I begin, I want to commend Findegil for doing such a thorough job of finding all relevant passages to be included.
all bits in italics are my proposed changes. Any section not remarked on is one I've agreed with completely. CE-EX-01: I agree about this insertion, but your version is somewhat choppy, as it contains some repetition. Maybe: Quote:
CE-SL-01: agreed. just a question, are we going with Ork or Orc? CE-SL-02, -03, -04, -05, -06 and -07: I agree with the fact that they need change, but I have a few minor suggested changes. For 03 we should remove "again" from "the stars were again shining in the morrow-dim" because in this version they have always been shining, so there is no need to make note of their shining "again." For 04 In a similar vein, the preceding sentence reads: "It was still night and clouds were in the sky." we should no doubt change "still night" to "dark" because again, it was always night then. There is a reference you did not mark which I will call CE-SL-04.2 For 05 I think we could keep simply "by twilight" but we could also simply delete it. For 06 I think we should delete the reference to the Sun of summer. Inserting "later" to me seems awkward, and also seems to contradict that the sun was for Men and gave them the greatest joy. For 07 I would remove "in the spring of the year" because it was during the sleep of yavanna, and so there were no seasons. CE-EX-05: I agree about the insertion. Two small things: in your version Cuiviénen is missing its accent mark here and several other places, but that's minor. The other question is "Endon." the published Sil has Endor, so are we sure that "Endon" is the latest form? CE-EX-07: This section does not work at all tonally or in its subject matter. This is Tolkien analysing the nature of Morgoth, and does not fit at all in this section. CE-EX-08: The transition is jarring, and I think a subheading is need “Of Orcs.” If we remove the previous paragraph, then it should be placed here. Otherwise, this is good, as it flows with the narrative. CE-EX-10: I could not find where it was moved to. Why is it out of place there? CE-EX-11: this has too colloquial of a tone, maybe: Quote:
CE-SL-08: agreed. I have one question: Quote:
CE-EX-17: The text of the note is not finished, and so inserting it as is does not work. Perhaps a rewording of: Quote:
CE-EX-18: agreed. I noticed that you stopped after Quote:
Quote:
CE-EX-21: The word (sterile!) is awkward. Maybe remove: Quote:
CE-EX-24: I cannot find a source for the subheading, but this heading is plainly necessary, and the Captivity of Melkor is the period and the event it is describing, so it works. CE-EX-26, -27: This section feels tonally jarring, perhaps some minor editing is needed. I agree with -27 however. Maybe: Quote:
Quote:
CE-SL-12: Why was “and make an end” removed? CE-EX-30, -31, -32, -33, -34, and -35: The first part of this section feels to me to be very much against the tone and presentation of the Valar in the later legendarium. They are presented as physical pagan gods in war gear, whereas Tolkien later came to view the Valar as more spiritual and demiurgic in their conflicts. This description of them seems to reduce them from their state in the later legendarium as the Powers of the Earth to simply pagan gods. However, if we want to retain it, we must remove the reference to Salmar and Omar, as they were not major figures in the later legendarium: Quote:
[quote] { Thus was it that}[Then] the {Gods}[Valar] got them over the sea and through the isles, and set foot upon the wide lands, and marched in great power and anger ever more to the North. Thus they passed the Mountains of Iron and {Hisilome}[Hithlum] that lies dim beyond, and came to the rivers and hills of ice. There {Melko}[Melkor] shook the earth beneath them, and he made snow-capped heights to belch forth flame, yet for the greatness of their array his vassals who infested all their ways availed nothing to hinder them on their journey.> CE-EX-37: Ringil should be Illuin CE-EX-39, -40, -41, -42, and -43: This section is tonally jarring in many places, being an analytical text of motives, and often does not translate well into narrative form. I will recommend my changes: Quote:
Quote:
CE-SL-15: agreed. But shortly after this there are some lines that are awkward: Quote:
CE-EX-48, -49: looks good, except {Valmar}[Valimar] and {Palisor}[Endon/r] CE-EX-50, -51: This requires some changes: Quote:
CE-EX-52: This requires minor editing: Quote:
Quote:
CE-EX-59 to the end of -60: These sections should go under the next section, to be consistent. CE-EX-65 till the end: The complex philological discussions of the Elven clan names should be included, but I do not think they belong in the narrative itself. I think the QS (and AAm) sections should be put under the main “Of the Captivity of Melkor” heading, and the clan names, including the Avari discussion, should be placed under the subheading “The Clan Names, with Notes on Other Names of the Divisions of the Eldar.” To leave it as is is to ruin the flow of the narrative entirely, and make it virtually unreadable. Phew, that was a long one! Fndegil, you did an incredible job synthesizing so many varied sources of such differing types, and I really have to commend you! |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
![]()
I was just throwing together a draft for the next chapter and I saw a good addition from the Grey Annals for the Captivity of Melkor. Maybe in this way:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Hello guys,
I just wanted to let you know that I have read through ArcusCalions comments. Thanks for the detailed criticism. I think some of your suggestion will make it to the final text. (e.g. your CE-EX-35.2). I as well have read your misplaced post in thread about the Athrabeth (probably you should replace it there with a comment that is a misplaced post and but it in here). I will have to read through all this again with my original text beside and my own comments to my changes as well. But it is late already here in Europe (3 o’clock in the night actually) and I will therefore postpone that. (Since I am very occupied in real life, am not sure how soon that might be.) But one more general comment might be in order: I can see your point that the stuff from MT is awkward in style if taken to stand inside a narrative. But we have to be careful in that territory. The project once to the great annoyance of one of its initiators decided to shy bake from any stylistic change. That meant our finished work is not supposed to have any high literature value. (At least in the first step. If motivation would last - as it seems it has not - the members that wanted the stylistic changes envisioned a second phase, in which they would go through the finished work again and remove all the tonally jarring jumps.) Respectfully Findegil P.S.: I see the need to have my draft of the chapters before this one up here in the forum, and to work on that was what brought me here today in the first place. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |