![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Okay, I have at long least done my home work for this discussion. You will find in the following editorial marks as we used before and the editing as odl members are used to. To distiguish the points discussed here from that of other chapters I used AFA-ZZ to mark all points of interest.
Quote:
AFA-01: I tried to avoid the naming of the Tale of Adanel as an Appendix, therefore I intorduce this sub-heading and a similar one for that Tale under AFA-10. AFA-02: Under this reference we should discuss the complete intorduction and how much of it we would use. AFA-03 and AFA-04: As the Manuscript is the later text, I think we should use what is provided of it. AFA-05: This is Arvegils change 1. It is a bit strange to me that this was not changed in the small genalogical table provided by Christopher Tolkien. But things become clearer when we read in HoME 11. There Adanel is named a daughter of Malach Aradan and with this the sister of Magor. AFA-06 and AFA-07: These were Arvegils145 changes 2. and 3. but i think I edited them a bit diffrent. AFA-08: Even so I my self found the addition of Argon to liberal, I see now a strong need for a replacement for Fingolfin. It read very stange to mention Feanor as the only named dead. Alternativly we could either put some colloquila phrase like 'and many beside him' or we must skip the mention of Feanor as well. AFA-09 and AFA-10: These are the passages that suggest a longer time between the Fall of Men and the cinverstation between Finrod and Andreth. I agree somewhat hestitatingly to Arvegil145 that they might stand. AFA-11: Only the title. I skipt naming it appendix. AFA-12: Even if the style is bit awakward, I found the Note 9 useable as in intorduction supossedly written by the later editor of our book looking back to the through the ages of Middle-Earth. AFA-13: Since we have no reference we must provied one here. AFA-14 and AFA-15: Since we revaled in the introduction that we are dealing with a Numenorean source I think we could let the name House of Hador stand. But this can be disputed. Respectfuly Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 09-08-2015 at 08:51 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 369
![]() |
I agree with pretty much everything - but I still think that House of Finarfin should not be used - it is a matter of consistency, even though some readers might find it confusing.
House of Hador (in the beginning of the Tale of Adanel) - same thing.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 369
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 247
![]() |
Well I have to study all the post of this thread with more time. Only say faster that the introduction, I managed inserting it in the chapter Of the Coming of Men into the West and the Metting of the Edain and the Eldar , to start the "tale" more "literaturist".
I'll follow the posts. Greetings |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |