Will The Hobbit do damage to the books?

[Mister Underhill]

Originally Posted by Kuruharan

Yes, we are adrift in a sea of idiots, but in many respects we always have been.

Optimism!

Faces fell, forlorn
Words of doom, green and eerie
Y'all should google cats

*pops a few tabs of Pez of Westernesse*

*tosses a dwarf*

[Kuruharan]

Originally Posted by Mister Underhill

*tosses a dwarf*

Hey!

[Mister Underhill]

Originally Posted by Kuruharan

Hey!

Only in the name of profit! You can't argue the mass appeal of Dwarf-tossing. Also belching.

*belches*

[Zigûr]

Frustrated to see a post from the "J.R.R. Tolkien" official Facebook page come up today on my Facebook news feed. I don't follow the page myself because it's essentially just a promotional/marketing page for the publishers. A Facebook friend had liked this post so it came up.

It was Gandalf's quote to Pippin from the films, "The Return of the King" specifically, about death; the one that repurposes Frodo's arrival in Valinor, with "all is turned to silver glass" and so forth, and misleadingly uses it to describe some kind of pleasant "afterlife" (as opposed to quiet contemplation in the halls of Mandos).

This was posted with "-J.R.R. Tolkien" below it, as if this film quotation, which repurposes some language from the books, was an exact quote from the man himself.

Absolutely pathetic on the part of the publishers and another piece of evidence for how the films actually do distort the public perception of the author, even if they don't "damage" it.

Some comments pointed this out, fortunately, but it turned into the usual useless "book vs film" argument of the calibre typical of Facebook comments sections.

The palimpsest is in full effect, it would seem.

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by Zigûr

It was Gandalf's quote to Pippin from the films, "The Return of the King" specifically, about death; the one that repurposes Frodo's arrival in Valinor, with "all is turned to silver glass" and so forth, and misleadingly uses it to describe some kind of pleasant "afterlife" (as opposed to quiet contemplation in the halls of Mandos).

Unfortunately, a lack of distinction between books and films was an inevitable consequence of the movies' popularity.

To those who haven't read the books, or are only familiar with them through a single reading, it would seem the films are the definitive version of the story.

To me, that line of Blanchett-Galadriel's along the lines of "even the smallest person can change the world", has stuck in my craw because it wants to put itself forward as the "inner meaning" of LOTR.

[Zigûr]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Unfortunately, a lack of distinction between books and films was an inevitable consequence of the movies' popularity.

Quite so; it's the official representatives (or at least the publishers) getting in on it that rankles me.

[Nerwen]

Originally Posted by Zigûr

Quite so; it's the official representatives (or at least the publishers) getting in on it that rankles me.

Are you sure it's not just a mistake by a lowly intern? I mean, instead of being a directive from higher up?

However, the fact that there apparently wasn't a crackdown on this kind of thing after the much worse example you gave earlier does suggest the publishers are unconcerned about the issue- at the very least.