T-I-G CIV: Spambot Apocalypse (Game Thread)

[Rune Son of Bjarne]

Adult Friend Finder, was there ever a more devilish foe? I doubt it, for aren't we all here in an attempt to find friends and likeminded people?

Anyways, we are not many left here, the number of casualties are worrying. We will need to be swift and efficient.

So let me start of with the first raised eyebrow (it probably does not qualify as an acusation):

Originally Posted by Legate

Just for clarification, maybe our dead Moddess program can confirm just for general knowledge that we really have all the roles that are mentioned on the admin thread? And also the number of the Spambots? In any case that leaves rather packed village (or, however it should be called... "server") in terms of most of the roles being special.

Clarification is nice, but not something we should deal with here, and it these sort of request that can easily be used as a smokescreen.

[Kitanna]

Originally Posted by Rune Son of Bjarne

Adult Friend Finder, was there ever a more devilish foe? I doubt it, for aren't we all here in an attempt to find friends and likeminded people?

Anyways, we are not many left here, the number of casualties are worrying. We will need to be swift and efficient.

So let me start of with the first raised eyebrow (it probably does not qualify as an acusation):

Clarification is nice, but not something we should deal with here, and it these sort of request that can easily be used as a smokescreen.

As I skimmed through posts I see that Rune's first post seemed to bring in a bit of discussion.

Originally Posted by Zil

A spambot might consider openly questioning the number of its kind, certainly. So might the innocent, though. At any rate, it's rather vexing to not know what we're facing.

Originally Posted by Morsul

Rune already tossing up a slight suspicion on Legate, Can't say much about it since he didn't say "Legate is a bot" But setting someone up early for a lynch would be a pretty good strategy especially if done so subtly.

Originally Posted by G55

Probably? Accusation? Raised eyebrow is enough; that whole (explanation) wasn't really necessary. Then, Probably? As in, allowing for a possibility that this can go as an accusation? Or that you don't know? And, if it goes as an accusation, it's the worst one I've seen in all my games. Already on defense without any attack? Hmm.

Originally Posted by G55

I am a wolf.

Thanks for the heads-up.

Originally Posted by Morsul

Rune and Shasta only two so far raising any flags but both these are based on uber flimsy(even for me) logic of Rune trying to toss suspicion on legate and Shasta working with the idea of two spammies because it could lull innocents into a sense of security.

I'm not sure where your suspicion of Shasta is coming from.
Because Rune says "ooo Legate is suspicious (but not really suspicious) because I'm not throwing accusations around or anything, but rule clarification can be used as a smokescreen"
Then Shasta says "I think because of the narration there's probably two bots" which looked to me like an interpretation and not trying to lull anyone into any sense of security. Because if we manage to take down two bots and the game is still on, well we just play as we have always played until we find the third. Shasta's statement didn't seem nefarious or lully to me at all.

Originally Posted by Zil

Highly doubtful a bot would say that, unless they wanted to give the seer a good target. G55 is up to something though, it seems.

I've seen it work before to the favor of the wolves. I don't feel like it's G55's way to blatantly declare such a thing, but doesn't mean it's not possible.
*glares at G55*

Originally Posted by Morsul

Never stopped me from playing weird and confusingly, can I get an amen?

AMEN

Originally Posted by Sally

I've missed you too, princess.
But is this something a Botanna would say to make me think she is the real Kit? Maybe we should lynch her just to be safe.

And our neverending battle of who finds who more suspicious begins anew. Ah, how I have missed this, old friend.

Originally Posted by Rune

My guess is that people don't want to vote for an active person on day one, and under any circumstances it would be wise to look furter than Galadriel.

I don't find that to be strictly true. I've seen a lot of "so-and-so isn't here, I want him/her to have a chance before I vote for him/her."
As for G55 I see her very much throwing some randomness out there which could be A) her trying to confuse the village B) her starting conversation so we have trails to follow Day 2.

Originally Posted by Morsul

So I'm trying to decide if I want to vote early based on flimsy as Mordor "evidence" or abstain.

If you abstain you are playing it very safe by not throwing out an opinion, but that sort of behavior is just as suspicious as voting on flimsy evidence.

DL falls at about 6 AM my time and unless my dog gets me out of bed at 5 I'll be sleeping through the DL. I have about 5 hours (6 maybe) and then I'll have to vote. And I get the feeling it will be a flimsy, illogical vote based on the discussion thus far because I hate the idea of abstaining from voting.

[Morsul the Dark]

Originally Posted by Kitanna

I'm not sure where your suspicion of Shasta is coming from.
Because Rune says "ooo Legate is suspicious (but not really suspicious) because I'm not throwing accusations around or anything, but rule clarification can be used as a smokescreen"
Then Shasta says "I think because of the narration there's probably two bots" which looked to me like an interpretation and not trying to lull anyone into any sense of security. Because if we manage to take down two bots and the game is still on, well we just play as we have always played until we find the third. Shasta's statement didn't seem nefarious or lully to me at all.

This was to something I said not Rune, just so no one is confused.

[Morsul the Dark]

OK goin to lay down.

++Rune

based on the barely there evidence I'ver mentioned before, and if nothing else this might stir the pot a bit.

Edit: Forgot highlght

[Kitanna]

++Morsul

Like I said his posts are the only ones to raise my eyebrows and I need to go to bed so I can't wait around hoping for more discussion.

[Blind Guardian]

Hello, everyone. I actually am here. I'm going to refrain from voting tonight because I can't remember all of the rules and what everyone does so I don't wanna hurt anyone at all.

Also, I have NO idea what time this ends (I think 4PM AZ time? Or 5AM?) If it's 7:31AM GMT and 12:32AM AZ w/o DST?

But yeah, I just wanted to check in and let you guys know I'm still here.

[satansaloser2005]

People have been Day 1 jumpy toDay, misinterpreting posts and accusing others then agreeing to laugh some of it off as jokes. Such exchanges will require examination later, but for now, I have to put priority on who should remain active on this forum.

While I'm not sure it points to her guilt, I find it strange that BG suggested Nerwen remind other players about the start of the game, yet she hasn't shown up herself. It's 4.5 hours before the DL and she's not yet shown up, which I think means she likely won't be here at all. As much as I hate to risk lynching someone when they're not around, I do think she'd have made a point to pop in if she were "important" in the forum. If anything, at least we won't be losing anyone who has contributed thus far....

++BG

And with that, I'm gone for the night. BG, if you do show up and you're innocent, I do hope you manage to swing the ban hammer in a better direction, but at this point I'd prefer to just cut our losses and take out the possible blind threat (pun absolutely intended).

Good night, good night. Parting is such sweet sleep time.



EDIT: Oh, that's just bloody typical. Hello, BG. *waves* DL is noted above in my post. I need sleep now. G'night, folks!

[Blind Guardian]

Originally Posted by satansaloser2005

People have been Day 1 jumpy toDay, misinterpreting posts and accusing others then agreeing to laugh some of it off as jokes. Such exchanges will require examination later, but for now, I have to put priority on who should remain active on this forum.

While I'm not sure it points to her guilt, I find it strange that BG suggested Nerwen remind other players about the start of the game, yet she hasn't shown up herself. It's 4.5 hours before the DL and she's not yet shown up, which I think means she likely won't be here at all. As much as I hate to risk lynching someone when they're not around, I do think she'd have made a point to pop in if she were "important" in the forum. If anything, at least we won't be losing anyone who has contributed thus far....

++BG

And with that, I'm gone for the night. BG, if you do show up and you're innocent, I do hope you manage to swing the ban hammer in a better direction, but at this point I'd prefer to just cut our losses and take out the possible blind threat (pun absolutely intended).

Good night, good night. Parting is such sweet sleep time.



EDIT: Oh, that's just bloody typical. Hello, BG. *waves* DL is noted above in my post. I need sleep now. G'night, folks!

Hey, right here dude. And that time thing was sincere. Thus why I'm late.

Edit: I took out the big red ++BG so it's easier for the admins. Also I managed to get the forum time to my time. Yay! Yeah, I'm not being much help, but deal with it. I'll have read through an old game by tomorrow, hopefully, and have figured this stuff out again. I haven't played for 2 years like some of you guys, and the last time I did I got my arse banned

[Kitanna]

Originally Posted by Morsul the Dark

This was to something I said not Rune, just so no one is confused.

Indeed you did. I changed the quote, not sure how I messed that up.