WW CI - Mutton yesterDay, mutton toDay and mutton toMorrow

[Loslote]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Hm. This is the line: "though I still don't think a wolf!Gil and an innocent!/Nerwen would be acting like this."

I read that as saying you both could be either/or. Maybe Lottie herself can explain for certain.

I meant, I don't think this behavior is likely if Gil is a wolf and Nerwen is an innocent. Considering I was pretty sure (wrongly, as it happens) that Gil was a wolf, I didn't think it likely that Nerwen could be innocent. Since it turns out Gil is not a wolf, my suspicions on Nerwen are starting to seem less likely.

[Rikae]

I'm surprised I'm not dead. That's actually why I didn't even look until now.

Anyway, I can't believe Brinn posted like that and didn't dream Gil. I suppose there might have been some wishful thinking involved on our parts, though; this means she most likely didn't dream any wolves or leave any clear hints about the innocents she dreamed (except me, but I guess the wolves are counting on people doubting that now; or perhaps I'm enough on the wrong track that they think I'll be helpful in leading people astray?)

Be back later. I don't know what to think now, so it's really back to the drawing board.

[Inziladun]

Overall I'm not inclined to think Lottie evil. Her suspicions and votes have been seemingly consistent, and she's coming across as an innocent Lottie. It's also very unlikely she'd be packmates with either Morsul or Nerwen.

x/d with Rikae

[Inziladun]

No one's mentioned the Wizards' kill choice yesterDay, I don't think.

Greenie wasn't around last Night due to connection issues. I'll try to take a look back and see if there's anything she'd said earlier that might shed any light.

[Inziladun]

I don't see anything in Greenie's previous Night posts that strikes me. She's really back-and-forth on her suspicions though.

It turns out she did make one post the last Night, but there doesn't seem to be much to it.

She responds to Cop questioning her about why she wouldn't elaborate on her suspicions on Boro the Night he was lynched. He answer was that she thought Cop might be the Clever Troll who had dreamed him. She then said that Brinn being the Clever Troll put Rikae in the clear and thought it unlikely Gil, and especially Nog, were dreamed by Brinn.

She ended by questioning Nerwen's positing that Brinn may have hinted that she was going to dream Nog.

[Morsul the Dark]

Ok, I have to work in the morning and won't be around before deadline so I have pretty much the next hour and maybe an hour in the morning.

I'm probably not going to vote today because it would be a fairly hasty decision and based on the same evidence I had yesterday.

I will say this though unless we're blessed with a clever/lucky purseholder we have toNight and the next to get the lynch right otherwise we lose.

Did I not warn of that scenario yesterday Gil and Morsul easy lynches suddenly the villageis one lynch away from a loss and with three wizards that'd be pretty easy to arrange one wrong vote they bandwagon and poof the end.

If you can tell I'm not exactly sunshiney and happy today I'll do what I can to help But honestly my list in no particular order of suspiciousness.

Lottie
Sally
Nerwen or Nog

Edit: x'ed with McCab yeah I meant ranger but the purseholder is still in play so there's that...

[Nerwen]

Originally Posted by Morsul the Dark

Did I not warn of that scenario yesterday Gil and Morsul easy lynches suddenly the villageis one lynch away from a loss and with three wizards that'd be pretty easy to arrange one wrong vote they bandwagon and poof the end.

The trouble is, though some people might have been ready to lynch Gil on the supposition he had been dreamed, what really did for him was the way he acted yesterDay. I don't think I've ever seen an innocent act that much like a flailing wolf.

And that's the trouble. Wolfish votes for him are going to be hard to pick- I mean they probably won't look opportunistic or unreasoned.

[Morsul the Dark]

Originally Posted by Nerwen

The trouble is, though some people might have been ready to lynch Gil on the supposition he had been dreamed, what really did for him was the way he acted yesterDay. I don't think I've ever seen an innocent act that much like a flailing wolf.

And that's the trouble. Wolfish votes for him are going to be hard to pick- I mean they probably won't look opportunistic or unreasoned.

Except the one who said nothing except he's a bit suspicious and voted for him when the wind changed. That vote looked pretty opportunistic to me.

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by McCaber

Do't we have this one and one more if the ranger doesn't get any more saves? Last I played it was when villagers = wolves that we lost. Of course, I've been gone for a while so I might be misremembering.

Wouldn't an innocent lynch toNight make it 6:3?

Originally Posted by Morsul the Dark

I'm probably not going to vote today because it would be a fairly hasty decision and based on the same evidence I had yesterday.

You're not going to vote? Or maybe you mean "today" as in RL day.

Originally Posted by Morsul the Dark

I will say this though unless we're blessed with a clever/lucky purseholder we have toNight and the next to get the lynch right otherwise we lose.

Originally Posted by Morsul the Dark

Did I not warn of that scenario yesterday Gil and Morsul easy lynches suddenly the villageis one lynch away from a loss and with three wizards that'd be pretty easy to arrange one wrong vote they bandwagon and poof the end.

Aren't you making contradictory conclusions there?

[Morsul the Dark]

I mean RL Between now and DL I havea total of maybe two hours tops.

How are the contradicting they both amount to we might only have two lynches left before we lose...

edit: this is in response to Zil if not clear

[McCaber]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Wouldn't an innocent lynch toNight make it 6:3?

Yes, and unless I'm greatly mistaken it would need to be 3 villagers to 3 wolves for us to lose, as opposed to the 6 villagers to 3 wolves we'd have if we missed our lynch today.

Can I please get an official clarification on this?