WW LXXXIX: The Terror of Tol Fuin

[Legate of Amon Lanc]

Originally Posted by Nilpaurion Felagund

But since apparently this Lottie gal attracts lynches that would make me jealous, I'm beginning to suspect if this theoretical logical situation applies at all. The baddies's latest kill drives home the point--why not kill one of the Lottie voters instead (since it gets rid of a trusted villager AND a possible Seer), unless one of them is a baddie?

Why not kill one of Lottie-voters? Exactly because that's what is logical - they might be protected. And one can also wonder whether they did not suspect some WWs up to the point that the WWs thought it will be unwise to target them as it might be interpretated as trying to get rid of somebody who suspects them. Or whatever, the options are many.

Right now, a simple list of people:

GREEN ZONE
Nogrod - no change from yesterDay, looks okay.
Lommy - also still looking okay.

YELLOW ZONE
Greenie - not posted since yesterDay, therefore no change
Sally - ditto.

ORANGE ZONE
G55 - still wary, although I am a bit flip-flopping about her right now; some things she said lately sound more innocentish, but then some are sort of so general observations that they sound false (like basically seconding what I said and the stuff she says as conclusion about Nerwen also isn't anything really new and for some reason, it just strikes me as something a lazy Wolf could write without raising too much fuss and buzz)
Eomer - simply still wary of him, see above
Mithalwen - moving her here, with the yesterDay's total slipping under the radar (and previous) and not sure what to think of the overanalysing of Nerwen's kill (as mentioned above)
Nilp - moving him here too. His analyses don't really analyse anything, aside from that, there are some logical holes in his analyses, or he seems to have a tunnel vision - or then he is intentionally just keeping certain point of view. Like when he analysed Nerwen, it is nice to try if the WWs didn't think she was a Seer, but since it very much seems like they didn't, why not drop the assumption in favor of something more logical and try again, instead of wasting the effort on something which really does not seem to work? Anyway, the way he posts is just too chaotic with me - maybe it's not actual suspicion, but somehow disapproval of his style. More clearly phrased thoughts, please. A list from him about what he thinks about various people would be very nice, for example.

RED ZONE
waiting to be filled with people from above...

GREY ZONE
Bom - so, shall there be input? I am not in the true sense of the word suspecting him based on how he voted yesterDay (or rather what he said about the vote), but I would still really want to hear from him.