![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
I think PJ is prejudiced against elves, and wants to make everyone else hate them too.
That's the only explanation for all of this, unless he believes that people are so shallow that women only go to movies with strong female characters (I've never understood this idea...) and that guys have to be tempted by hot female actors to go see a movie. ![]() Also, I'm more scared now then I was when I thought Itaril/Tauriel was Legolas's love interest...if she isn't his love interest, then she's likely someone else's. Which quite frankly scares me. If she ends up being Thranduil/Bilbo/Bard's love interest, I'm taking a knife to the screen. Same if she ends up being the one to slay Smaug/sneak the dwarves out of the dungeons/rescue them from the goblins.
__________________
Busy, Busy, Busy...hoping for more free time soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
![]() |
Popeye's Existential Conundrum
It seems clear to me that this re-branded demographic loss-leader of a "character" suffers from Popeye's Existential Conundrum:
"If I'm not me, who am I? And if I'm somebody else, then why do I look like me?"Recruiting this actress from the cast of the TV-movie "Lost" does seem rather appropriate, though, if one has a taste for unintended irony.
__________________
"If it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic." -- Tweedledee |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Pilgrim Soul
Join Date: May 2004
Location: watching the wonga-wonga birds circle...
Posts: 9,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
When I heard the new name I thought of the geometrical shape a toros (like a ring doughnut) . Is maybe not inappropriate - a shape without proper substance and a heart and torus being Latin for cushion - I mean this is part of the padding needed to turn a short book into two long films. KERching!!!
__________________
“But Finrod walks with Finarfin his father beneath the trees in Eldamar.”
Christopher Tolkien, Requiescat in pace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Curmudgeonly Wordwraith
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits
Posts: 2,515
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tauriel? Tauriel!
No elven name can hide the smell. That sulfur stench from fan-fic wells Up from Jackson's scripting Hell.
__________________
And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Relic of Wandering Days
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: You'll See Perpetual Change.
Posts: 1,480
![]() |
Well, maybe I shouldn't see the movies! What the?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
![]() |
Lost and Not Found
You may have a valid reason for staying home with a good book, given the truly depressing speculation currently taking place at the OneRing site:
http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2011...in/#more-45330 "Just who is Tauriel?" Short answer: "Nobody." I'd like to see Bilbo Baggins and Smeagol/Gollum doing "Riddles in the Dark." That will no doubt happen. Bilbo and Smaug will also have their little verbal duel over a pile of looted treasure. Bilbo and Thorin will fall out and reconcile over the Arkenstone. Perhaps Christopher Lee will get sufficient screen time to show the slow-motion corruption of Saruman the White. I'd like to see that on the big screen. But having to endure this needless elf-chick thing when so many other tales need telling, well, that I resent -- bitterly.
__________________
"If it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic." -- Tweedledee |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pilgrim Soul
Join Date: May 2004
Location: watching the wonga-wonga birds circle...
Posts: 9,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I suppose at best she might be one of the raft elves unnamed in the book. But every bog name they get for small? roles just seems to say they have no confidence in the screen play on it's own merits and htey hope we will be too busy star spotting.
__________________
“But Finrod walks with Finarfin his father beneath the trees in Eldamar.”
Christopher Tolkien, Requiescat in pace |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Really! What's the point of doing book-to-movie adaptations if they're just going to monkey around with it for the sake of making the story "cinematic"? What's the need for creating characters like Lurtz and Tauriel? What's the need for adding new scenes or characters for "drama" or "extra tension"? I see today's movie makers as having a deal of contempt for the viewer, who isn't advanced enough to appreciate movies unless there are explosions, odious comic-relief, and high-visibility romantic subplots. I know there's the rare book that translates fairly well to the screen (Richard Matheson's Hell House and the Harry Potter series come to mind), but to me Tolkien's work just isn't suitable for movie treatment.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Christopehr Lee is the one thing making me go see this movie after all the new Tauriel stuff - if he get cut, I am 99% positive that I am not going to see this movie.
__________________
Busy, Busy, Busy...hoping for more free time soon. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|