![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#3 | |
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Thanks for the response! I'm intrigued that it's not mentioned as a key reason against using the ring because imo, it's an even more pertinent issue than the one's mentioned in the book. I mean what's the point in using the One Ring to throw Sauron down when all you're doing is sending him on a sabbatical (as long as it may be!) and in the process probably putting another Dark Lord in place. Then we'd eventually get to the situation where, when Sauron eventually regained power, that there'd be two Dark Lords in middle-earth! At first I thought that Sauron was foolish for creating the One because of the obvious flaw that it presented and that the perceived gains weren't worth the risk. But the more I thought about it, the more foolproof the concept seemed. If the point that I raised is true, then literally the only way that Sauron could be finally defeated (after creating the One) would be the followed path in the books i.e. willfully unmaking the Ring in Orodruin, and even that proved to be impossible, as was shown with Frodo while on the precipice. I apologise for the babbling, as I know I'm going over stuff that you guys would have gone over a thousand times. I feel like a Hobbit discussing herb-lore ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |