![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
My appologise for not coming back to this further, but I had a hard time keeping track of the other discussions.
NA-EX-45.3: Aiwendil wrote: Quote:
Quote:
NA-EX-47.6: Okay we leave the text like it was in the Lay. But my I probably very carefully suggest the unthinkable? ![]() ![]() NA-EX-56.6: You are, the could not wandering occupations for him between the flight from Dorthonion and the Nirnaeth. NA-EX-57.1: I do not fight for that add. It was a just the only additional information that my search through all the descriptions of that battle brought up, so I sought I should at least offer it. I will skip it. About the editorial bridges leading into the fragments of the Lay: I will go through them one after the other, but for know I have only time for one: NA-EX-37.2b: Here the bridge is not needed. We will do without. Respectfully Findegil |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
NA-EX-45.2: I think there was a typo in my suggestion. I meant: Quote:
NA-EX-47.6: A footnote?! Blasphemy of blasphemies! Actually, I think this is a good idea in this case. If it were prose, of course, there would be no reason to put in a footnote what could easily be added into the main text, but in verse things are different. And of course unlike the infamous Ainulindale footnote proposal, there are no thorny Aelfwine/Pengolodh issues here! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
NA-EX-45.2: That is okay for me.
NA-EX-45.3: They heard cries before so why not that of Túrin? The face is another matter. But it brought up a news idea: Quote:
Quote:
Back to editorial bridges: NA-EX-44c: Quote:
NA-EX-44.2; NA-EX-45: Here also the bridges can go. NA-EX-47 See above. NA-EX-48b: Here I would slightly rearange: Quote:
NA-EX-52 had no bridge right from the start. NA-EX-55: The bridge can go, even so I find it usefull. On last pice remeans: But it is not in the Narn. It is the pice we took in in the last chapter of Beren and Lúthien BL-EX-19. While reading this I got the same feeling I had have before: Where exactly does this belong? Who is the whisperer and to whom does he whisper? Where it stand know it needs the bridge but probably when we really discover where it belongs it can go without? If I have any clearer idea about that I will post the according thread. Respectfully Findegil |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
NA-EX-45.3: A nice idea, but I have to say it looks like too much creative writing is required. We're already moving back and forth between prose and verse quite a bit, so I don't think the short prose insertion is a problem.
NA-EX-44c: It occurs to me that if we omit the verse additions to the 'Turin's Fostering' section, then this will be the first switch in the chapter (I think). So perhaps it would make sense to keep the bridge here at least. Edit: I just realized there is an earlier verse excerpt at NA-EX-37.2b, so probably we should keep the bridge there but eliminate it here. NA-EX-44.2: Perhaps eliminating the bridge but changing the punctuation to a colon might be good, since the verse section starts with a description of Taur-nu-Fuin: Quote:
Quote:
On BL-EX-19: I was actually going to suggest that once we're satisfied with the Narn we briefly revisit the already completed chapters. Reading through the finished texts for them I found a few issues, mainly very small things. I suggest we look at BL-EX-19 at that time. Last edited by Aiwendil; 04-17-2009 at 04:52 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Another thought before I forget it - I wonder whether perhaps we should try somehow to incorporate the two short 'independent poems' in alliterative verse that Tolkien developed from passages in the Lay and which are given at the end of the chapter in III.
One of them, untitled, is based on part of Gwindor's speech about the river Sirion at Eithel Ivrin, lines 1554-1570 in the Lay. I'm almost tempted to suggest that it was in fact a replacement passage for those lines. We may want to consider using it as such. The other is 'Winter Comes to Nargothrond', developed from lines 2082-2113. This is a bit different, since it not only expands on the passage in the Lay but also leaves out the narrative portions. So it would seem there's no way for us to incorporate it; at least we can't simply replace the corresponding section of the Lay with it. This is a shame as 'Winter Comes to Nargothrond' is in my opinion one of Tolkien's finest pieces of verse, but I suppose that's neither here nor there. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Halls of Mandos
Posts: 86
![]() |
While I have no objections to NA-EX-46b as such, I dislike the composition and flow of the additional verses. I'll see if I can't think up a better form for them, if you don't object.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 369
![]() |
Quote:
Maybe it would be better at this point: Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Halls of Mandos
Posts: 86
![]() |
Quote:
I tried my hand at a replacement passage, and got this: Quote:
Quote:
(Oh, and the "but" at the beginning of the first line (181) should be capitalized like it was in Tolkien's version: I already changed it in my post.) |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Your suggested lines are quite good, but I'm afraid I still think it's too great a liberty for us to take. I still prefer to keep the prose passage.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I must say that I disagree with you Aiwendil. The Lay is in this part for sure the most detailed text we have. That makes in natrually to our basic text. From that we have two tasks: 1. we have to bring the text to the cannon version of the story line in generall and in detail and 2. we have to add details otherwise lost if possible. A compareable situation we have had in the Lay of Leithian. We were in the lucky situation that we only found one very small passages at the departure of Beren and Felagund from Nargothrond, were we had to actually produce ryming lines. But we did aviod breaking the poem by prose inserts and we did so by propose. Here prose inserts are more acceptable here, that is true, because we already jump backward and forward between prose and poem.
But in this case we would aviod a break between a 290 line part of poem and a 560 line part. And the prose froming that break is only 5 lines of which 1 1/2 is an anyway an artifical expansion of an note from the author. Aran, I like your lines, so I have to agree to Aiwendil that you might have used a bit to much freedom with the text. At least I would aviod the jump back to Beleg as observer. The two lines 'And seeing this heaume, __ with sight of elves,/Beleg the bowman __ did burn with cold wrath:' could be skipt with an semikolon in the line above. And so I know that it is alway easy to critisise, I still have to say that 'casque' is hard to bear. It is too french. Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Halls of Mandos
Posts: 86
![]() |
I must admit, I am torn here. I agree with Aiwendil that this seems too much of a textual liberty, but I also agree that when the main text is poetry we should edit with poetry.
Findegil suggested altering the lines to: Quote:
As an aside, I just noticed that the line "Tied the man lay to __ a trunk of a tree" doesn't seem to alliterate properly. We should try and find a suitable fix for it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
To the same effect as in the other part of the Narn I would like to reoppen a dsicussion about NA-EX-57.1:
Quote:
Findegil: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Respectfuly Findegil |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10
![]() |
I don’t know if it’s necessarily a contradiction, but in CoH it was said (and inserted, but as far as I see through the system atm without a number?) that before Gwindor fled from the mines he
Quote:
Quote:
I also find the characterisation of the Enfeng of Belegost as "of troth unmindful" questionable in light of the later conceptions. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
About the dagger:
Good catch! We could of course construct a story to discusse the contradiction away, but cannonical safty would lead to the elimination of the hole passage in the Lay. The implication in CoH is clearly that the short sword that Gwindor got was forged in Angband. But it is not made explicit. Therefore we could assume that the short sword was the dagger or knife and that it was part of the spiols of war and only for repiar in the forge of Angband. Quote:
Respecfuly Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |