Werewolf LIII: The Republic

[Boromir88]

I'll save you the trouble of looking. Yeah, that's exactly what it was. I wasn't sure, so I jumped in with everybody else.~Ilya

That's understandable, it's difficult to tell the difference between a bandwagoning wolf and an innocent who was convinced by someone else's arguments. That's why wolves bandwagon, because telling the difference between the two is near impossible. Although, the fact is bandwagoning is a sign of wolvish-ness and therefor anyone who does it should automatically be looked at.

I will also say you are quite the sweet talker, but I'm still a little wary. Because it either means you're genuine, innocent, or maybe you aren't as new to this as you are trying to convince people that you are?

Ok, I hope you can follow that last question, more of a rhetorical one from me though.

Why not tp? Why not Boro?~Nogrod

Well, I would move to pass the motion that since neither tp, nor myself died on Night 1, that Shasta and Mith are both in the clear.

[Boromir88]

It did me, but I worry that it is simply because I am biased in favor of not trusting Nog at this time, therefore anything he says is incriminating,~the phantom

Not exactly sure why you're asking me, I wouldn't be the most unbiased person to ask, because my strategies and styles have been absolutely warped by you, but anyway I will tell you what it reminds me of...

Reminds me of when you are a wolf, how you absolutely love to dangle "answers" right out in the hopeless innocents' faces, without leading them to the correct answer.

Like I said though, I'm probably not the best person you can ask, for a fair opinion...hmm too bad Agan left. Morm? Ilya?

[Boromir88]

And some more thoughts in response to you, tp....

Reminds me of an old argument...hmm, maybe I can come up with another Downerism, because I know this aggravated SpM greatly. The argument that if SpM wasn't dead by Night 3 he was obviously a wolf, because wolves would not leave around an innocent SpM.

So, he uses this argument and lumps several "wolf-banes" together, and out of them, he's obviously the innocent one, who is now being singled out. However, it's peculiar that he doesn't point out the possibility that McCaber was a safe kill for wolves, because he wouldn't leave a trail. Why did you leave out that possibility Nogrod? Did you leave it out, because you realized it would be completely conflicting with your argument about why one of the "wolf-banes" wasn't killed last night?

[the phantom]

Meh... guess it's not that obvious then.

What it reminded me of is the way I talked about Kuru in the game where you and I were WWs. I tried to lump myself into a small group with him and talk about why the WWs weren't killing us, and come up with reasons for it. Anyway...

EDIT: x-posted Boro and Mith