Werewolf LIII: The Republic

[Aganzir]

Originally Posted by Eönwë

He always seems to be right (well not about me, but generally). Now people can just latch onto him if they think he's innocent and hope he still has his "psychic powers". Of course, this also allows WW to "latch onto him" and not look suspicious.

I think that's too simple. I'm not questioning Shasta's psychic powers but it's maybe a bit too much said that "he always seems to be right".
It looks as if you were trying to buddy up with him.

Originally Posted by Eönwë

Well, he seemed to me a little cautious and not trying to get on anyone's bad side, as well as making points that seem good.

I'm not sure I agree - usually Nog's points are more or less good in spite of his role.

Originally Posted by the phantom

I think I've already used all of my credit with them buying myself invincibility. Yeah- if I'm lynched or targeted at night nothing happens. The Moddesses thought it might be unfair, but they agreed to it in the end because it was historic. And they were drunk.

Poor you. I can't think of any alternative but that you keep playing and hope I get to be a wolf some game.

edit: xed with Ilya & Eönwë. Call me elitist if you wish, but I include myself in the few ordos we can afford to lose. Fair enough.

[Aganzir]

Huh my Downs just stopped working for a while.

I'll go now, and Shasta & Brinn will vote for

++Lynch Legate

Because I couldn't decide between him and Eönwë and his way of posting annoys me more. This means that Eönwë has just been saved from receiving two votes and he could thank me by posting a detailed list of his suspicions tomorrow.

[Boromir88]

What case? Where?
It was a list. ~Agan

This frightens me; Agan in 276:

Guilty
Lommy. I know I tend to suspect her, especially on the first days. And to me she almost always seems overreactive and suspicious. But it happening always is not an excuse for me to put her in the Neither cathegory so she's happily here again.

Then you proceed to point out all the strange comments/things about Lommy.

Last time this struck a chord with me when Mac (too bad I never had the spine to vote for him) brought suspicions up about Brinn; Brinn referred to it as a "case," and Mac protested; trying to say Brinn over-reacted to a couple of his thoughtful musings. It was odd because the bottom-line is it was a "case" against Brinn. Mac was definitely stretching, but the reaction of "Woah, Brinn! I didn't make a case against you," was what stuck out. It was a case. Period. Mac said Brinn looked suspicious and proceeded to quote her several times to make his case.

Agan, you made a case against Lommy. Have the spine to admit it. You listed Lommy as guilty and have gone after her, that's a case. Don't try to play it off like you really didn't mean anything by quoting Lommy repeatedly, post after post, and play it off like Lommy is being over-defensive.

And now you're backing off, after a couple people say Lommy is looking genuinely frustrated (i.e. makes her look innocent)? Trying to seperate yourself from someone you wanted to get lynched?

Edit: crossed with everything since Agan's post 373

[the phantom]

Originally Posted by Nogrod

And I'm still a bit bothered about phantom's first Day "maybe I requested to be an ordo with my special relationship to Fea" -stuff.

I already answered that.

Di is the one that dared to go into the realm of Moderator bias based upon RL circumstances. I merely countered by planting an alternative version. I agreed with whoever it was (Lommy I believe) that attempting to claim such a thing would be unsporting. That's why I worded it the way that I did.

I'm hoping that answers any doubts you have about it.