WWXXXV: Werewolves among the Wolf-men - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

the guy who be short · 07-03-2007, 09:06 AM

Guy walked off outside the cave, and read once again the voting record of the past few days.

"I am quite certain," he said, "that we have at least one, and perhaps two quiet wolves. The no-kill on Night 3 shows that the wolves somehow slept through the Night, which implies quiet wolves with poor communication to me, perhaps the absent Gil, as well as Izzy and Mith.

The behaviour of Gil recently has been quite bizarre. It seems he feels under pressure, a possible sign of wolvery. Mith tried half-heartedly to divert Nogrod's lynching onto Gil yesterday, so I think if Gil is a wolf, Mith probably wont be and vice versa.

Brinn makes a couple of good points about Izzy. However, I'm not really sure Izzy's vote is suspicious simply because Nogrod said to look out for the third voter: I don't understand what is meant to be suspicious about the third vote in particular. I suspect it was just an attempt to discourage people from voting for him... What worries me more about Izzy is that, like Mith, she fails to mention many people at all.

So, among the quiet, I am most in favour of lynching Mith, then Gil, then Izzy.

Oh, and about Mith, in response to Mac: I stand by my reasoning. It would not be foolish to spend the whole time campaigning against lynching Nogrod - if he had turned out to be gifted, it would have made Mith look very good indeed. I feel that she did have time to build a case if she wished: she certainly had more than an hour. I appreciate that there may be factors outside of our community that affect her behaviour, but I still find that behaviour suspicious, in relation to the Save Nogrod Campaign, and bizarre in reference to the "Our Wolves Didn't Sleep Through The Night, Despite The Evidence" thing, which she is still continuing.

I wish I had more time to analyze the Nogrod voters. Alas, I must go for a while, and return only to vote thereafter. Good luck, Outlaws."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

07-03-2007, 09:06 AM	#15
the guy who be short Shadowed Prince Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Thulcandra Posts: 2,343	Guy walked off outside the cave, and read once again the voting record of the past few days. "I am quite certain," he said, "that we have at least one, and perhaps two quiet wolves. The no-kill on Night 3 shows that the wolves somehow slept through the Night, which implies quiet wolves with poor communication to me, perhaps the absent Gil, as well as Izzy and Mith. The behaviour of Gil recently has been quite bizarre. It seems he feels under pressure, a possible sign of wolvery. Mith tried half-heartedly to divert Nogrod's lynching onto Gil yesterday, so I think if Gil is a wolf, Mith probably wont be and vice versa. Brinn makes a couple of good points about Izzy. However, I'm not really sure Izzy's vote is suspicious simply because Nogrod said to look out for the third voter: I don't understand what is meant to be suspicious about the third vote in particular. I suspect it was just an attempt to discourage people from voting for him... What worries me more about Izzy is that, like Mith, she fails to mention many people at all. So, among the quiet, I am most in favour of lynching Mith, then Gil, then Izzy. Oh, and about Mith, in response to Mac: I stand by my reasoning. It would not be foolish to spend the whole time campaigning against lynching Nogrod - if he had turned out to be gifted, it would have made Mith look very good indeed. I feel that she did have time to build a case if she wished: she certainly had more than an hour. I appreciate that there may be factors outside of our community that affect her behaviour, but I still find that behaviour suspicious, in relation to the Save Nogrod Campaign, and bizarre in reference to the "Our Wolves Didn't Sleep Through The Night, Despite The Evidence" thing, which she is still continuing. I wish I had more time to analyze the Nogrod voters. Alas, I must go for a while, and return only to vote thereafter. Good luck, Outlaws."