WW XXIX Dor-en-Gaur

[Firefoot]

All right, good point, Ang. I also noticed this, in Kath's first post:

So we're supposed not to rely on past suspicions. Very well. Boro, Eomer and morm are all innocent! That probably goes for Lommy, Volo and Roa too. And Rune and Gil.

All dead - and all innocent (well, Rune to the extent that he wasn't a wolf - and we don't know if the wolves know who he was, either).

However, your evidence, Ang, is largely hinging on whether Lal is a wolf. If she is, then yes, killing Kath could very well be worth it. If she's not, though, I would be extremely wary of killing Kath.

How exactly does your role work - as in, when can you make kills, and when do you have to decide?