![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Party Tree
Posts: 1,042
![]() |
I can say that the book is richer than the movie. Where LOTR and even HP movies have left out about a 1/4 of each book, Eragon movie left out about 3/4 to give an idea. The book was shaved so thin it's see through. They didn't even have the werecat!!
![]() It was a major disappoint to me. It's near impossible for me not to like a movie. At least it was enjoyable spending some time with my girls. I so wanted it to be good. My suggestion-borrow the book from the library and rent the movie.
__________________
Holby is an actual flesh-and-blood person, right? Not, say a sock-puppet of Nilp’s, by any chance? ~Nerwen, WWCIII |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Wight
|
ive read the first two books but havent seen the movies, I was asking a friend about the movie and i too was surprised at how much the movie cut out.
__________________
God created night, but man created darkness.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Tears of the Phoenix
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Putting dimes in the jukebox baby.
Posts: 1,453
![]() |
I really wasn't surprised they cut out a lot from the movie (though I was saddened to see the Anjela's part cut so much), mainly because, when you read the books, you can tell that he's trying to stretch it into a story that is greater than LotR.
And it doesn't work because...well, he's not all that talented (sorry fans). Though, actually, now that I think about it, he and Tolkien did share something in common. Lack of character developement. Now, before you throw your stones at me, let me elaborate. The hobbits were developed, as is Eragon to a degree. However, Legolas/Arya/Arwen (we'll put the elves together), Brom/Gandalf the White (not the Grey), Sapphira... I wouldn't really care if any of those characters died. I'd say, That's too bad and then move on. Tolkien can get away with it though, because his work is...epic. It is meant not to be relatable, it is meant to be a shadow (to borrow an illusion in MacDonald's the Golden Key) of things beyond us. It is a tale of good and evil, etc. Tolkien can pull this off because...he's grown up. He knows things, because he's lived longer, experienced things a teenager cannot experience (this is not to say that teenagers don't get It...but it does take experience and talent to write it down in such a powerful way). On the other hand, Paolini was homeschooled (nothing against them, I'm one myself), but the point is, most homeschoolers (that I've met, including myself), are sheltered. Last I heard (I do not know if this is true), he was still living with his parents and he is now in his 20s. That will effect your writing. It has effected mine. So, when it comes to making a movie, there really isn't much to work with if you're comparing Eragon to Lord of the Rings. I want to say that I did enjoy the movies more than the book (and, for those who know me and my intense dislike for the Inheritance trilogy), this is saying something. The characters seemed more real (not totally real, but a little closer), and yes, the dialogue was painful --~~ that was even in LotR though, as I'm sure some of you will eagerly point to a certain blonde haired elf. And, like the LotR movies, the music was pretty. Hope this wasn't too rambly.
__________________
I'm sorry it wasn't a unicorn. It would have been nice to have unicorns. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |