Tol-in-Gaurhoth XXVI - Úcenite Valto

[Nogrod]

Originally Posted by The Saucepan Man

One thing intrigues me. Much of the debate has focussed on Esty and I today. How did that happen? Possibly because Roa chose the two of us as the sole subjects today for her infamous and impressive analyses. And seemingly, she had made her mind up before carrying out those analyses (in my case at least).

I guess we all know that those who are being talked about are much more prone to be lynched than those we do not discuss. I also know Roa to be the master of that tactics: bringing people into the foreground - and if they seem to be dropping from there, lightly adjusting the situation and knocking them back to the center of the stage again. But she does that as an innocent too if she suspects someone.

But because the basic dynamics of these games seem to be that the involved ones get lynched and the silents, funnies or zero-contributors (or whatever - I'm speaking of a normal game here) do not, I always like to see to it that we reverse the trend - if there are no actual reasons to act otherwise. Now as we have killed our careful wolf here, I'm not sure whether the other one is as careful too, or whether my principles hold here in the first place.

But I still find the enemy that lurks in the shadows, under any radars that could give me an idea about it's hiding place to be the most creepy enemies. And in a situation of general doubt would like to vote that way.

I'll go back to the thread now.