![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The South Downs
Posts: 24
![]() |
Ho Hum...
The whole problem is that PJ made the films with all the 'other' people in mind, not just the fans. Sorry, couldn't resist that... Anyway, I simply think that Pete and crew went in the wrong direction with this second installment. Their unnessary character alterations and created plot threads bog down this already-complicated-story in my opinion. But of course... none of this can be helped now. P.S. Now what they needed was Christoper Tolkien to review and approve the scripts... Yeah right, like he would've ever been satisfied!
__________________
Trotter... the Hobbit ranger with the wooden shoes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halls of Mandos
Posts: 332
![]() |
I think with TTT, they did the best they could, which is still very, very good. And honestly, I think the length of the battle is well nigh perfect. Of course, I only currently own the theatrical releases, so I haven't watched the extended versions in a while. But I thought it was very well done. It progresses clearly, never gets repetitive, and builds upward to the Forth Eorlingas climax.
The Ent scenes are the toughest to adapt, IMHO. If they had went with the book, it would have been an emotional letdown. Same for Frodo and Sam's storyline. If Faramir just lets 'em go, they basically have nothing to do for the rest of the film, since they aren't going to Cirith and Torech Ungol in this movie.
__________________
"If you're referring to the incident with the dragon, I was barely involved. All I did was give your uncle a little nudge out of the door." THE HOBBIT - IT'S COMING |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The South Downs
Posts: 24
![]() |
Quote:
In my humble opinion... I think that the pass of Cirith Ungol should have been in the film. Indeed, it should have been the climax of the film. I have heard the arguements about why it wasn't in though, something about it clashing with Helm's Deep, which was supposed to be the climactic moment in Pete's TTT. And it not fitting into the timeline of the other storylines. Granted, those are good arguements, and the entire film would've had to have been reworked had old Shelob made an appearance. But I still believe that the film could have been better had they kept the voice of Saruman and Shelob in... I'll just have to wait until I make my own version...
__________________
Trotter... the Hobbit ranger with the wooden shoes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The South Downs
Posts: 24
![]() |
Quote:
Yeah, as I said, the entire film would've had to have been reworked, which is something I wish they would have done. I would've had Frodo, Sam, and Gollum for the last half hour of the movie, and then bring them in later in ROTK so that the timelines would fit. Trotter
__________________
Trotter... the Hobbit ranger with the wooden shoes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halls of Mandos
Posts: 332
![]() |
Well, that works in the book, but I don't think it would work very well in the film. If they'd thought it would work, they could have just split TTT and ROTK up into the separate books the way Tolkien did, and had half of the movie be one story, and half the other.
__________________
"If you're referring to the incident with the dragon, I was barely involved. All I did was give your uncle a little nudge out of the door." THE HOBBIT - IT'S COMING |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|