![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Spirit of the Lonely Star
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,133
![]() |
But isn't the key to all this how we define the concept of "honor".
Here are all the definitions of honor I could find in dictionary.com: Quote:
There is one episode concerning honor that no one has mentioned from the LotR. When Frodo comes home, one of the things that the author brings out is that he, unlike Merry, Pippin, and Sam, is accorded absolutely no honor by others in the Shire. The ironic thing is that he will shortly lose his life--if we equate sailing to the West with a permanent withdrawal from the activities of life. So is honor necessary for life to continue? Is Frodo's loss of honor an inevitable harbinger for his unavoidable sailing to the West? Or has Frodo surmounted "honor", and gotten to a point in his own life where the accolades of others truly aren't needed? Hence his need to leave the mundane life of the Shire and go where others of his kind have not previously gone.....
__________________
Multitasking women are never too busy to vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
![]() ![]() |
Thanks for a most excellent post, Child. I think that the sub-text under point #1 is also part of our discussion here.
Do we not find that the specificities of points a. & b. under #7 are removed from LotR, whereas the generality (or dare I say unity?) of #7 is evoked? What I'm suggesting is that Tolkien avoids getting bogged down in a. & b. while holding fast to #7 main point. As for Frodo, my sense is that he neither wanted nor needed honor of any kind, and was happy (if we may call it that) to stay at Bag End in peace and quiet, and would have done so if not for his grievous wounds. Sam may have been pained by the lack of honor, but we can't really infer that Frodo was pained (by that). |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|