![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
View Poll Results: Who or What is Tom Bombadil | |||
A nature spirit? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 29.17% |
The spirit of Middle-earth itself? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 22.92% |
A Maiar? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 10.42% |
A Vala? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 6.25% |
An Elf? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
A Dwarf? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.08% |
An immortal Man? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
The reader? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.08% |
Eru? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
I'll tell you in my post! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 27.08% |
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Eagle of the Star
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sarmisegethuza
Posts: 1,058
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Quote:
________ OG KUSH PICTURES Last edited by Elu Ancalime; 03-03-2011 at 11:03 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Spectre of Decay
|
![]()
In the early drafts of LotR, Tom calls himself 'Aborigine', not 'Eldest'. As Christopher Tolkien observes in his footnotes, the likely times for Tom to come into being are before the flight of Melkor and Ungoliant or, more likely, during the time in which Melkor was banished in the Void. Since Tom remembers the dark beneath the stars when it was fearless, Varda's star-kindling must have taken place before his memory begins, and therefore he was not alive when the Dark Lord originally entered Arda, first of all the Valar. That basically blows all of the 'Tom is an aspect of Eru', 'Tom is the spirit of Middle-earth' and 'Tom is a forgotten Maia' theories I've seen out of the water and leaves us with a character who is an anomaly. He's not exactly an Elf, certainly not a Dwarf, and while he could be a Man (the most likely explanation in my opinion), his great longevity is difficult to explain. In his letters, Tolkien points out that Middle-earth is an imperfectly conceived universe, and all but tells his correspondant that Bombadil can't be made to fit at all.
Personally Bombadil strikes me as Adamic, which might explain his long life. We might, I suppose, take him to be an image of unfallen Man, blessed with length of years and a disdain for worldly concerns, but even that would take some explaining, since he was in the lands about the Shire before the Elves first passed through. Tolkien was probably right: philosophizing does not improve him. My instinct is to accept the character as a mystery and mark up all inconsistencies with the main mythology to the vagueries of the branching acquisitive theme. After all, Tom was conceived long before he was made a part of Middle-earth, and it's perhaps inevitable that some of the joins should still show.
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne? Last edited by The Squatter of Amon Rûdh; 02-20-2006 at 08:19 AM. Reason: Aberrant occurrence of 'Tolkien' for 'Tom' corrected |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Squatter wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Spectre of Decay
|
![]() Quote:
As for the kindling of the stars, my knowledge of the Silmarillion material never was that amazing; perhaps it's time that I read it again. My main point remains the same: Tom Bombadil is none of the above: he's a character who had nothing to do with Middle-earth at the outset, and who therefore was never assigned a satisfactory place in that reality. To look for one seems to be to forget that Tolkien's Middle-earth is invented, and that he freely admitted its imperfection. My reaction to some of the more common Tolkien imponderables has always been that they tend to be totally disproportionate, concentrating on really quite unimportant details of the story. Tom Bombadil's origins are less boring than Legolas' hair or Balrog wings, but there's still no answer, and surely his role in the narrative is clear enough. Does it really matter that we can't fit him neatly into Tolkien's world? I also wanted to point out the opinion of Christopher Tolkien, who is quite definite about the two alternatives I outlined in my previous post. My own view is very nearly 'who cares?', but when I turned up that information in HoME VI I remembered this and other discussions.
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
Eagle of the Star
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sarmisegethuza
Posts: 1,058
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Haunting Spirit
|
Quote:
__________________
„I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Well, of course he had to develop Tom. Frodo and Co. couldnt have met Mr Enigma, for then he couldnt have development of all. So while Tolkien created him as an enigma, I believe that he developed his character to be an enigma, also. So he is Enigma-twofold, in his literary concept, and actual characterzation. There can be no rebuke against his literary standard.
________ HONDA GL500 Last edited by Elu Ancalime; 03-03-2011 at 11:21 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |