Tol-in-Gaurhoth XIII: Enter Shamville

[littlemanpoet]

Your quick retraction of suspicion against me, my dear undead sir, could be taken either way; but my instinct tells me that it's based on sound reasoning. We shall see if my plan and the discussion that ensues, ferrets out any more questionable or suspicious content. Let's hear it on the plan, people! Oh, and watch your step as you enter the viewing room. The first step can be tricky.

[Glirdan]

She.

I'm sorry my dear Firefoot. Please forgive me.

Lmp, for your plan, I'd have to say that I'm against, yet also for it. I'm torn both ways. It would be really unwise to place one person in charge because, as he said, that would mean we could possibly be putting a Wolf in charge and he would have easy power of unfluencing us in our votes. Yes he might influence us in voting for a Wolf the first time and then innocents afterwards and we might all sit here and think "Oh it's just bad luck we're having here" and that would ensure I victory for the Wolves. Or he might make us vote for an innocent and imeadeatly make us suspicious of him. And if he doesn't get attacked at Night, we'd be able to guess that he/she's a Wolf.

We might put an Ordinary villager in charge and he/she might make us, accidentally of course, but unknown to us, an innocent villager and then we go and lynch him the next day and that would mean three innocents in a matter of two Days and 1 Night.

We might put a gifted in charge and if we do and then that gifted gets attacked at Night, we're in big trouble. Or if the gifted makes us accidentally lynch an innocent and we lynch him the next day, we're in big trouble again because there goes someone we really need to help us be rid of this curse.

I think our safest course of action would be to not select someone to be in charge. There's to much to risk.