The Midsummer Maulings (WW5)

[mormegil]

Currently I would rather vote for Durelin as I mentioned earlier. We have an interesting dynamic in this game where a clear majority needs to be reached. So bandwagoning isn't alltogether a bad thing. But her approach wasn't explained so I see some suspicion in Holby. I will probably vote for either Holby or Kitanna who I have mentioned before as well. Holby is new on my list but Fea's arguement actual does make some sense .

As for Kitanna's vote for me it's a bit odd and weak evidence at best. At that stage odds are you could pick anybody at random and say they are innocent and be correct. I, however, never stated definatively that Gil1 was innocent but that there is doubt in my mind as to his guilt and I'm giving him the benefit of that doubt. I want to preserve and innocents life and I'm accused based on that...

Well I shall be back soon and give my vote. Again I'd prefer Durelin today but seemingly the tide is going elsewhere.

[Feanor of the Peredhil]

TGWBS: Huh?

Now the million dollar question: if I change my vote, will I be accused of wolvish association with Fea?

Probably. After all, I've already "slipped" in telling everyone I'm a wolf. In all seriousness right here: I just want you to remember that I'm not at all certain on Holby. There's an extremely good chance that all my seemingly shoddy evidence is just that: shoddy. But she's the one I suspect most. After her, it would probably be Mormegil. After him (and weirdly enough, I agree with him on this one), it would be Durelin. Morm could be a very clever werewolf hiding himself in plain sight. If he's a wolf, he's probably laughing his head off because so many people suspect him, but nobody's doing anything. On the other hand, if he's innocent, he's probably not laughing, and is probably thinking "Thank God they aren't voting for me. That would seriously shorten this game."