![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
To compensate, they had the terrible Faramir deal. Frodo and Sam had nothing to work with so they make Faramir into a supposedly huge threat: which is not exciting and the whole affair totally demeaned Faramir. What a woeful character he turned out to be. He barely came off better than that blonde guy who says:
"It is as the Lord Denethor predicted; long has he foreseen this doom!" And let me tell you, that guy did not come off well. O, and Helm's Deep was stretched out way too far. My mother was absolutely sick of it. Not everyone likes battles. Now, I agree that the battle should have been the centrepiece of the movie, but it should not have consumed the story like it did.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
It couldn't have worked from a timing point of view without moving a good portion of the beginning of RotK back to TTT.
As Frodo, Sam and Gollum are climbing the hidden staircase, the armies of Mordor are marching on Osgiliath, en route to Minas Tirith. So, Orthanc, Pippin and the Palantir and Gandalf and Pippin riding to Minas Tirith and meeting Denethor would all have needed to be added in to TTT. It only works in the books because the two storylines are presented sequentially rather than concurrently. But to do that on screen would have been incredibly confusing for audiences and would not have worked at all. And I might as well tack on my usual refrain on such questions: What's done is done. We have what I consider to be three amazing films. Either watch 'em and enjoy 'em or don't watch 'em at all.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
I'll never accept your rationality Sauce: Send Shelob back to TTT!!!
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
Raffish Rapscallion
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Far from the 'Downs, it seems :-(
Posts: 2,835
![]() |
At the risk of this post being filled with too many quote tags I plan on quoting a few things but mostly limiting myself to referring to things that have been said. Having said that, let me start off some quotes.
![]() Originally posted by Eomer: Quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by Eomer: Quote:
Quote:
). But I think that the Extended Edition of Two Towers did a lot of good to Faramir's character, though I'm not about to say he couldn't still have been a lot better. As for the 'most disappointing cliff-hanger possible,' I'm not to sure whether I agree with you there or not. I agree that Shelob could have been put into TTT (putting aside the timing element that SpM just mentioned) without too much trouble. Like Eomer said, it was Jackson's choice to have Helm's Deep be the 'be all & end all' of the film, & he could easily have scaled it down a bit to accomodate Shelob and a great ending. I think having Frodo "alive but taken by the enemy" and Sam either alone in Mordor or knocked out outside the gates (however you want to do it) would make a great ending. But I don't think that the current ending is the worst piece of filmmanship (<---I'll be darned if that's not a new word) ever. At first I was greatly disappointed mainly because I found I wasn't going to get to see Shelob, but if you look at it from a non-book movie goers point of view, it's actually pretty foreboding. TTT ends with Sam's speech (which I liked) & Smeagol reverting back to Gollum, having made the decision to lead the hobbits into a trap in which Frodo & Sam would be killed & the Ring lost to Gollum again. We aren't clued in as to where this trap is, when it will be sprung, or who the heck this 'she' is. Being left in the dark about something big that's going to happen can generate a lot of suspense. I know quite a few people who went ahead & read the books because they couldn't stand to wait & find out who the 'she' was. I think the ending is at the very least ok. I'm not 100% sure whether Shelob would've been better in TTT or not, but I am sure that she would've worked there, contrary to what Jackson & Boyens keep trying to tell us. And the ending would have been better in my opinion also. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Maundering Mage
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,651
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I am not saying that I agree entirely with everything in the movie but I don't see this as a major sticky point. I've never liked the Faramir in the movies but that's another thread I'm sure.
__________________
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo. "So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hauntress of the Havens
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IN it, but not OF it
Posts: 2,538
![]() |
Now, now, Eomer...
![]() While I agree with you that Shelob is better of being in TTT, that would destroy the uniformity that all three movies ended 'relaxed'. I mean in the movies there's nothing that would make you scream, "Hey! What happened? Don't end yet!" Anyone can wait for a year to know how the story goes after the breaking of the Fellowship, what would happen to Frodo and Sam and Gollum in Mordor and who 'she' is, or what the events after Helm's Deep will be. If TTT ended with such a cliffhanger, non-book-reading movie watchers might terrorize PJ into releasing RotK right away. ![]() But then again, RotK became too emotionally climactic because of Shelob's placement there. Frankly, that movie was almost too much for me to handle if I haven't read the book. On the other hand, TTT was too dull due to Helm's Deep's exaggerated length. PJ could have reconciled the climactic Shelob scene and a 'relaxed' ending in TTT, but that would render the entire point of Shelob's appearance senseless. So, like SpM said, what's done is done.
Last edited by Lhunardawen; 07-03-2005 at 04:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
I disagree with this talk of emotional balance. I say we end the film on the highest level.
Now, I'm not saying that Sam screams out "Oh no! THEY'VE CAPTURED MR FRODO!!!" and then a big THE END flashes up on screen. Clearly, you'd have your little Gandalf speech about the Ring being beyond their aid and Theoden et al nod wisely and then it cuts back to Samwise who has this horrified Uh oh! look and then the camera pans out to reveal Mordor in all its shadowy terror. Now that would rock. Why do we need the whole thing with Faramir going "Oh, now we understand each other Baggins!" (despite the situation being ridiculous) and then they walk off and talk about Samwise the Brave, after a terribly boring 'battle' for Osgiliath in which nothing interesting happens. The only thing that happens is some drunken catapult action. And no-one ever wanted to see that. I understand the argument from time, but I would just say this: You can tell the story by the appendices' timeline or you can tell the story by the books. Shelob was in The Two Towers.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Sword of Spirit
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh, I'm around.
Posts: 1,401
![]() |
Cut and Dry.
1. Putting Shelob in RotK made that movie long too long.
2. Taking her out of TTT made that movie boring. She should have been in TTT. ![]() BUT, just to be devil's advocate, I have to point out that the really cool Deagol-Smeagol intro would not have worked. With Frodo in Cirith Ungol and Sam headed that way, Gollum is nowhere near. It would not have made sense.
__________________
I'm on a Mission from God. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|