![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#34 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
RD-EX-77.5:
I am okay with "for" -> "since" §51d: The symetrie of the warnings is a good argument which I did not consider. we will skip the cruse by the blood stain. But your editing does skip the comma which I think is grammatically needed: Quote:
Findegil |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|