![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
It seems to me that the 'Maldon' lines are a 'general' statement while the Boromir verses are specific to the individual & the circumstances. Besides, isn't it a bit 'off the peg' - shouldn't Boromir have had something 'made to measure'? I'm not sure the idea of them simply customising a standard 'shrink to fit' poem fits in with the mood of the occasion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Perilous Poet
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Heart of the matter
Posts: 1,062
![]() |
Most societies develop funeral rites that follow set traditions, or 'off-the-peg'. Same for births and marriages, etc. I don't think following a respected formula diminishes the meaning, in this instance.
__________________
And all the rest is literature |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Gibbering Gibbet
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beyond cloud nine
Posts: 1,844
![]() |
I’ve been thinking about the discussion about the nature of Amon Hen, and figured I would go to the source to see if there are any clues – by “the source” I mean, of course, philology.
In Old English, æmen means “uninhabited, desolate, desert”. An associated word is æmenne which means simply “solitude”. I think that this is pretty straightforward – Amon Sul and Amon Hen are both deserted places. More importantly, they are places of solitude, in the sense that in each there is a solitary battle or trial of the heroes (Frodo by the Witch King and then Sauron; Aragorn with himself as in each place he doubts his leadership and his decisions). The “Hen” has proved a much more interesting riddle. In Old English, hen is a form of hēan which means “lowly, despised, mean, or abject”. But it can also mean “to raise, exalt or extol” (in certain contexts, when used with the associated words hien or hyn which mean “high” or “raised”). “Hen” is also sometimes used as prefix, in which case it is being used as a form of hēanes which means simply “something high, a high place, height.” Finally, it is also associated with “hienan” which means to “fell or prostrate” or “abase, humble, insult”, “accuse or condemn.” I think it should be obvious by now the ways in which this little word hen can be applicable to the action of this chapter and the previous one. The Seat of Seeing is indeed in a high and desolate place, but it also marks a high point and a low point in the adventure. It is the place where Boromir is made abject, possibly even condemned of a crime or sin, but it is also where he is exalted and raised back up. I think that Aragorn as well goes from a low to a high, in terms of his spirits and his sense of doubt becoming a sense of heroic purpose. Perhaps Frodo, too, moves from a depressive and worried low to some kind of exalted height, when he heroically undertakes the Quest by himself. This is also a kind of ‘condemnation’ of him, however, insofar as he is now condemned to a terrible journey. So putting it together I would think that “Amon Hen” means a place of solitary trial, in which the hero is raised up and exalted from a state of lowness. So it would appear that the Seat of Seeing is dependent, in some way, upon both the individual using it and some other power which watches over the locale. It is a deserted place of solitary trial (Frodo, Boromir and Aragorn all have their individual battles with their own inner doubts and despair). At the end of these struggles, they are all of them ‘exalted’ in some way, or raised up and aided during it. Frodo is aided by Gandalf during the struggle with Sauron, but it is Sam who lifts his spirits and goes with him to Mordor. Boromir is exalted by Aragorn. All this would appear to bear out my idea that this chapter is really about Aragorn, though, insofar as he exalts himself – unlike Boromir or Frodo he does not turn to another to lift him from his abject lowness, but proceeds to become the King-Hero he is meant to be by dint of his own efforts. Perhaps this is why Frodo sees so much from the Seat, while Aragorn does not: Frodo requires and will require the aid of others for the completion of his journey, so he is ‘given’ some vision by the place, whereas Aragorn must rely upon himself – he will be alone on his individual journey, and he is sufficient to the task, so the place does not need to give him any aid in the form of a vision. He sees only what he needs to see in order to make up his own mind. Just throwing ideas around now…
__________________
Scribbling scrabbling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
Quote:
I understand your reasoning, Fordim, but I am not sure if the Amon Hen 'effect' can be deduced from the experiences of the characters that you refer to because I do not see its influence as affecting its surroundings. As I see it, its effect only impacts (if at all) on those who visit it at the time that they visit. Frodo's resolve to go to Mordor alone does not come to him at the Seat. It was there all along, even when he left the company. But his visit to the Seat (as well as his encounter with Boromir) does go towards confirming what he knows deep down is the 'right' thing to do, so to that extent he is affected by its influence. Nor does Aragorn find his resolve at the Seat. He finds nothing there, and continues to despair after he has departed from it. As I said earlier, it is not the function of the Seat to make Aragorn's choice for him. He must do that for himself (although he does have support here from Legolas and Gimli and is aided by his subsequent knowledge of what has befallen the other members of the Fellowship), so I agree with your reasoning in that regard. As for Boromir, well he never visits the Seat, and it has nothing to do with his repentance. That comes from within him, when he finally sees the folly of his erstwhile plans. So, I am not sure that we can draw many conclusions as to the nature of the Seat from what happens to the characters before or after they have visited it, or from those characters who do not visit it at all.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! Last edited by The Saucepan Man; 11-25-2004 at 11:44 AM. Reason: To clarify point |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Hauntress of the Havens
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IN it, but not OF it
Posts: 2,538
![]() |
Wow! I can't believe we're finally discussing TTT! And here I am, late, as usual.
As Esty said, I believe one of the best things PJ did in the movie version was to add this to FotR. Doing so gave FotR an appropriate ending, and for the movie viewers, a little sense of hopelessness...only to have hope regained in the next part (I wonder how... ).Quote:
Quote:
Not only was Boromir's death a loss to the Company, to his father and brother, to Gondor, and to its allies...it also signified a potential succession from the rule of the Stewards to Aragorn's ascension to the throne of Gondor. Boromir died, yet Aragorn lived. Narsil was reforged and given to Aragorn as Anduril, while Boromir's sword--a symbol of his power and authority--was broken...incidentally, near the hilt. In this chapter, minds were made up, roads were taken, and burdens were removed. Frodo has finally mustered enough courage and whatever else he needed to go on to Mordor, allowing Sam to take the journey with him. Boromir "has taken his road," as Aragorn said, and was relieved of the guilt he would have carried. As for Aragorn, he has given up the burden, so to speak, of protecting Frodo. I believe he has no guilt over his decision nor the circumstances; he had to choose between those who left on their own accord and those who have been captured. Seems to me the most troubled ones are Merry and Pippin! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Deadnight Chanter
|
Quote:
The latter is not explicit from the LoTR itself, and one needs to draw in UT resources for that, but, ultimately, it comes down to that - Frodo trusts in (most of the time) what Gandalf told him to be the right way, keeps on trusting even with Gandalf (presumably for Frodo) dead - i.e. knowing that course of action chosen by Gandalf proved fatal for Gandalf himself, and knowing that it may well prove fatal for Frodo as well. Doing it hard way, one time too many shown by Boromir what 'easy way' may land him (and anybody else) in.
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal - Would you believe in the love at first sight? - Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Does it symbolise a command to Halt!? Does it symbolise control, manipulation. It seems to imply both. And the image of a human hand is incredibly ancient, even appearing on cave walls from the stone age. It is, after all, a human symbol - four fingers & an opposible thumb. If we didn't have this particular structure on the end of our arms we wouldn't have achieved anything. It gives us control over our environment by allowing us to make & use tools & to pass on information by writing. Effectively it is the third 'force' we've encountered in these last two chapters - the Eye, the Voice & now the Hand. Two out of three of these are presented as 'evil' - yet the three of them have made us the creatures we are - we see the world (the 'Eye'), communicate our 'sight' to others (the 'Voice'), & are able to control & manipulate what we've seen & described (the 'Hand'). Whatever point Tolkien is making with these attributions - the Eye to Sauron, the Voice to Gandalf & the Hand to Saruman - escapes me at the moment, but it is certainly intriguing. Oh, one final point, going back to the points made about Galadriel's symbolic 'connection' to Sauron - the Eye being 'also in my mind' - there is only one other occurence of the phrase 'white hand' in LotR other than to Saruman: Gandalf's verse in Meduseld Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Gibbering Gibbet
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beyond cloud nine
Posts: 1,844
![]() |
Quote:
) conclusions about Amon Hen I was applying them to the whole locale and not just to the Seat of Seeing. (Amon Hen is the hill itself upon which the Seat is situated, after all.)So, while I agree with your observations about people who sat/did not sit & when they endured their 'trials' my point is not directly about the Seat anyway. Hills are important for Tolkien and it seems they mark far more than just a physical geography but a moral one as well. Frodo's moral journey begins in Bag End (beneath a Hill), takes him to his first trial at Amon Sul (which he fails in a way) and then culminates (in FotR) at Amon Hen (in which he succeeds). His journey is itself a path from blindess-beneath-a-hill to obscured-vision-or-mis-seeing-on-a-hill to a moment of vision and clarity upon a hill. I suppose this makes sense when we consider that his journey will end at the summit of a mountain. Although it won't end there, will it? But back beneathe a hill. . .but not even there. . .will it end upon the hill of Westernesse?? So I stand by my point: Boromir, Aragorn and Frodo all find exaltation of a sort at Amon Hen (the hill, not the Seat of Seeing).
__________________
Scribbling scrabbling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Bittersweet Symphony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the jolly starship Enterprise
Posts: 1,814
![]() |
Quote:
Saruman, on the other hand, (no pun intended) is different. He takes things into his own hands -- or Hand -- and sets about doing things his own way. He fancies that he might obtain the Ring, an instrument or weapon worn on the Hand. It's interesting that Saruman is not attributed with the Voice in this sense, since his voice is his greatest source of power and influence. It's as though Gandalf is the voice of reason, and Saruman is that of lies -- he will make promises and false claims, but in the end it will all just come to better serve himself. As for the Eye, Sauron is able to see many things, both through "tracking" the Ring, and through the use of the Nazgul and his spies. That's all I can really think of for him right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Brightness of a Blade
|
thoughts about Aragorn's decision and other stuff
I know I'm overly late (the nerve of me showing up here after months of not participating
) but I finally managed to find some time to do this.I like it how the conversations between Legolas, Gimli and Aragorn mirrors the main characteristics of their races. Elf: Duty, the spiritual Legolas is insisting upon 'tending to the fallen' Boromir, all the while mantaining a very Elvish tranquility even sharing the grief over Boromir's death. In the middle of a somewhat desperate situation, he's the one who decides for the rest of the company that duty should come first. Dwarf: swiftness, practicality Gimli agrees with Legolas and, betraying his Dwarvish ways, wants the funeral to be done as quickly as possible because wasting time under such circumstances would be folly. (As davem and others have pointed out, this 'folly' happens nonetheless, mainly because the other two were in a musical mood. ![]() Man: action, doubt Aragorn meanwhile ponders almost obsesively upon the possible courses of action they should take once Boromir's funeral is over. "Maybe there is no right choice" , (Gimli) I've always asked myself what does this mean, why is Gimli being so pessimistic all of a sudden. I thought of it and realized that he is actually stating a truth. There was no right choice and no wrong choice. The path was already laid out before them and all they had to do was walk on it...In vain was Aragorn torturing himself over which course should he take - Fate had already decided for him (this string of unexpected happenings that go through the entire book and bind everything together into a fragile but thoroughly connected web, leading to the inevitable victory of Good over Evil). There was no right or wrong choice for Aragorn now, there was the ONLY choice. And the only choice becaomes apparent only when his heart dictates him the decision: "My heart speaks clearly at last." This reminds me of a short-lived topic I started a while back, who knows where it is now -(gives puppy-eyed look to HI the almighty unearth-er(?) of threads ); in which I argued that reasons often misleads those from the race of Men, while their hearts, sometimes acting against reason, never do. Lastly, I want to end this stream of consciousness post by drawing your attention to the very last paragraph of this chapter, which I love because it reads almost like a poem. It's got short, very descriptive sentences that really flow and have a dynamic rhythm that mirrors that of the Three Hunters in pursuit. Here I'll quote it in full for you to read again: Quote:
__________________
And no one was ill, and everyone was pleased, except those who had to mow the grass. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|